PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Sasanlimab plus bacillus Calmette-Guérin in BCG-naive, high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): Exploratory biomarker analysis of the phase 3 CREST trial.

View Full Paper
MGMatthew D. GalskyGLGloria LinNSN. Shore

Key Points

  • To explore the impact of tumor microenvironment features on treatment responses to sasanlimab combined with BCG in NMIBC patients.
  • Evaluated pre-treatment tumor biopsies for CD8+ T-cell infiltration, TMB, and gene expression
  • Performed exploratory analyses correlating biomarker features with event-free survival
  • Used Cox proportional hazards models for statistical analyses
  • No association found between CD8+ T-cell infiltration or TMB and improved event-free survival with sasanlimab and BCG
  • Inflammatory and immune signatures correlated with inferior event-free survival in BCG monotherapy
  • Certain transcriptomic subtypes showed improved event-free survival with sasanlimab and BCG therapy, contrasting poor outcomes with BCG alone

Abstract

806 Background: The primary analysis of the phase 3 CREST trial (NCT04165317), evaluating sasanlimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with BCG induction and maintenance (I+M) showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in event-free survival (EFS) vs BCG-I+M alone in patients (pts) with BCG-naive, high risk, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). A trend toward improved EFS was noted in pts with high PD-L1 expression treated with sasanlimab and BCG-I+M. We present additional exploratory analyses examining associations between tumor microenvironment (TME)-related features and response to sasanlimab plus BCG-I+M. Methods: Pre-treatment tumor biopsies were assessed for CD8 + T-cell infiltration by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (N = 609), tumor mutational burden (TMB) by whole exome sequencing (WES) (N = 543), and gene expression by whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) (N = 534). Exploratory analyses were performed correlating these features with EFS using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Neither baseline tumor-infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells nor TMB was associated with improved EFS with sasanlimab in combination with BCG I+M versus BCG I+M alone. This observation, coupled with our previously reported PD-L1 data (Powles, ASCO, 2025), suggested that single biomarkers may not adequately reflect the complexity of the TME and we therefore focused on transcriptomic analyses. Transcriptomic profiling revealed that inflammatory and immune signatures (effector and inhibitory signatures) were associated with inferior EFS in the BCG monotherapy arm, but not in the sasanlimab plus BCG-I+M arm. Consistent with these findings, bladder cancer transcriptomic subtypes known to be heavily immune infiltrated, such as UROMOL class 2b and TCGA luminal infiltrated, were associated with poor EFS with BCG-I+M but demonstrated improved EFS with sasanlimab+BCG-I+M (HR = 0.41 95% CI, 0.23-0.75, P < 0.01; HR = 0.46 95% CI, 0.25-0.86, P = 0.01 respectively). Importantly, such immunobiological features were present in subsets of tumors across NMIBC stages, underscoring that stage alone does not reflect the biological heterogeneity captured by transcriptomic profiling. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that pre-treatment NMIBC TMEs characterized by high immune infiltration are associated with poor outcomes with BCG monotherapy, potentially due to BCG promoting further upregulation of inhibitory molecules and adaptive immune resistance. The addition of sasanlimab to BCG-I-M may help overcome this resistance, offering a promising therapeutic strategy for pts with immune-infiltrated high-risk NMIBC. This combination has the potential to address a critical unmet need in the management of high-risk NMIBC, particularly within molecular subgroups associated with poor outcomes with BCG monotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04165317 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Galsky et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cd7ed48f933b5eed9d9fhttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.806
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The immunotherapy paradox in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A tale of three trials2026
  2. 2SASAN-SPARING: A phase 2 trial of sasanlimab maintenance as bladder-sparing option after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer.2026
  3. 3Cost-Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Plus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for High-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Analyses of CREST, POTOMAC, and ALBAN2026
  4. 4Selective bladder-sparing trial with sasanlimab as maintenance treatment based on clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment in molecularly categorized muscle invasive bladder cancer patients: SASAN-SPARING trial.2026
  5. 5Abstract 7266: Advancing insights into disease biology of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) through comprehensive multi-omics analysis2026