A 19th-century painting by Franz Paczka, Un cas grave (La leçon de médecine; ca. 1875–1880), depicts a young girl supported by physicians in a striking clinical tableau suggestive of an acute neurological emergency. The scene shows generalized rigidity with cervical extension, abnormal upper-limb posturing, and a cloth placed at the mouth. A small wound on the left hemithorax is historically described as a dog bite. These elements invite a differential diagnosis between generalized tetanus and rabies. Tetanus is supported by the apparent sustained rigidity and possible jaw involvement, and remains biologically plausible after a dog bite through secondary environmental contamination of a devitalized wound. Rabies, recently proposed for this artwork, remains a strong alternative diagnosis, although several defining features such as hydrophobia/aerophobia, hypersalivation, and fluctuating agitation cannot be confidently inferred from a single static image. Rather than claiming diagnostic certainty, this iconodiagnostic analysis argues that the painting is best approached as a structured differential diagnosis exercise illustrating both the clinical reasoning prompted by visual clues and the methodological limits of retrospective diagnosis from art.
Alexis Demas (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: