PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 4, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Inclusion of patients from Latin America in pivotal trials in genitourinary (GU) and cutaneous malignancies.

View Full Paper
EMErika MartínezAPAva De PellegrinJSJean H. Maselli Schoueri

Key Points

  • To evaluate the representation of Latin American patients in pivotal trials for genitourinary and cutaneous malignancies and explore strategies to improve equity.
  • Reviewed phase 2/3 trials for GU and cutaneous malignancies from 2015-2024.
  • Analyzed 46 pivotal trials for geographic origin and ethnicity of enrolled patients.
  • Extracted data on trial sites and reported patient demographics.
  • Latin America represented 6.3% of enrolled patients in pivotal trials (2,459 of 38,900).
  • All GU trials included mention of LATAM participation, while only a subset enrolled patients.
  • Melanoma studies had 88% LATAM participation mentioned, with higher representation in GU trials compared to skin cancers.

Abstract

646 Background: Latin America bears an increasing burden of both genitourinary (GU) and cutaneous malignancies but remains underrepresented in trials shaping global standards of care. This gap raises ethical concerns and limits data generalizability. We assessed Latin American (LATAM) representation in landmark GU and skin cancer trials and explored ethical and strategic approaches to enhance equity. Methods: We reviewed practice-changing phase 2/3 trials in advanced GU and cutaneous skin cancers (melanoma, non-melanoma) published from 2015–2024. Data extracted included geographic origin, trial site distribution, and ethnicity reporting. Results: Overall, 46 pivotal trials (26 GU, 17 Skin) including a total of 38,900 patients were analyzed. LATAM sites appeared in 44 trials, but only 25 trials enrolled Hispanic/Latino patients (n = 2,459 patients; 6.3%). All GU trials referenced LATAM participation, though only a subset enrolled patients. Among melanoma studies, 15/17 (88%) mentioned LATAM participation, while 2 (12%) did not. Across the LATAM region, participation was unbalanced: Brazil (16 trials), Argentina (14), Chile (13), Mexico (12), and Colombia (6). Representation was higher in GU trials (Brazil 13, Mexico 10, Argentina 10, Chile 9, Colombia 4) versus skin cancer (Brazil 3, Mexico 2, Argentina 4, Chile 4, Colombia 2). Transparency was limited: only 2 trials reported Hispanic/Latino data in main tables, 5 in supplements, and 23 mentioned it in ClinicalTrials.gov. Conclusions: Only 6% of patients from Latin America were included in pivotal trials of genitourinary and cutaneous malignancies. Barriers likely included infrastructure gaps, regulatory delays, and limited funding. Policies mandating geographic representation, and context-adapted designs are urgently needed to move from intended participation to meaningful inclusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martínez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a7cdaed48f933b5eeda314https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.7_suppl.646
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evolving Trends in Latin American Participation in Global Oncology Clinical Trials: A Decade of Phase III Activity (2013-2022)2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2Latin America and cancer clinical trials: Underrepresented region with significant growth potential.2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Representation of Latin American oncologists in oral sessions at the ASCO Genitourinary Cancers symposium: A five-year review (2021–2025).2026
  4. 4Lung Cancer Clinical Trials in Latin America in the Era of Cooperative Groups: A 20-Year Analysis2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Challenges and Opportunities for Cancer Clinical Trials Development in Latin America2025 · 2 citations