Introduction/objective This study aimed to validate a semi-structured qualitative interview developed to examine how physical activity in urban public spaces contributes to processes of social inclusion and acculturation among immigrant women; Methods A mixed-method validation process was carried out with the participation of five experts in social sciences, sport studies, and qualitative research. The evaluation combined quantitative measures - using Aiken's V and the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) - with qualitative assessments. Experts also provided detailed feedback regarding the clarity, coherence, cultural sensitivity, and thematic balance of the proposed items; Results The quantitative analysis showed high levels of content validity, with mean values of Aiken's V = 0.89 and CVC = 0.88, confirming strong agreement on the relevance and clarity of the items. Qualitative feedback highlighted the need for adjustments in wording, reorganization of sections, and the inclusion of items addressing family context, migration trajectories, and gender-related perceptions. Following these recommendations, the interview was expanded from 44 to 54 items, structured across ten thematic sections; Discussion/conclusion The resulting instrument offers a useful and flexible methodological tool to investigate the experiences of immigrant women in relation to physical activity and participation in urban public spaces, while incorporating dimensions of social inclusion, acculturation, and gender. Its capacity for adaptation makes it valuable for future studies related to these topics across diverse contexts.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ana Blanco-Ayala
Angela MAGNANINI
Daniel Medina-Rebollo
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Foro Italico University of Rome
Hungarian University of Sports Science
Universidad San Pablo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Blanco-Ayala et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91cbed6127c7a504bfb41 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1717266