PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Journal of Computational Science0 citationsOpen Access

Disturbance storm time index prediction with interpretable machine learning

View Full Paper
LPLuca PennatiJEJonah EkelundAHAndong Hu

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop interpretable machine learning models for predicting geomagnetic storm intensity as quantified by the Dst index.
  • Utilized historical data from the NASA OMNIWeb database for solar wind parameters.
  • Applied KAN networks and symbolic regression for closed-form expressions linking Dst evolution to solar wind parameters.
  • Compared models like multi-layer perceptron (MLP) and established empirical models.
  • Evaluated against historical storm events to gauge model performance.
  • MLP demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the symbolic regression models and established empirical models.
  • Symbolic regression models captured nonlinear dependencies and showed insightful physical interpretations.
  • Best symbolic regression models outperformed established models during significant storm events.

Abstract

The Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) index quantifies geomagnetic storm intensity by measuring global magnetic field variations. In this study, we apply interpretable machine-learning (ML) techniques to derive data-driven models describing the temporal evolution of the Dst index. We use historical data from the NASA OMNIWeb database, including solar wind density, bulk velocity, convective electric field, dynamic pressure, and magnetic pressure. We employ KAN networks and the symbolic regression framework PyOperon , based on an evolutionary algorithm, to identify closed-form expressions linking d Dst / d t to key solar wind parameters. The equations obtained via symbolic regression form a hierarchy of complexity levels and capture nonlinear dependencies and threshold effects in Dst evolution. In addition, we use a conventional MLP network as a reference black-box model. We benchmark all ML models against observed Dst data and compare their performance with empirical formulations such as the Burton-McPherron–Russell and O’Brien-McPherron models. The performance evaluation on historical storm events includes the 2003 Halloween storm, the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm, a moderate storm in 2017, and the extreme storm of May 2024. The data-driven models, particularly the MLP, demonstrate superior accuracy in most cases. While the symbolic regression expressions provide insight into the underlying physics, the results highlight an intrinsic trade-off between model interpretability and predictive accuracy. This is an extended version of a previous work presented in Markidis et al. (2025) 1 . • We design the state-of-the-art interpretable machine learning methodologies, such as symbolic regression and Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks, for space weather applications. We derive data-driven models for predicting the Dst temporal evolution, compare them to black-box methods, such as multi-perceptron neural networks in terms of accuracy. • We identify a hierarchy of data-driven symbolic regression models, obtained with the Operon framework, by varying equation complexity as input to Operon . We recover equations with progressively richer physical content and increasing accuracy. • We compare the discovered equations with well-established magnetospheric physics empirical models, such as the Burton-McPherron-Russell (Burton et al., 1975) and O’Brien-McPherron models (O’Brien et al., 2000, 2022), in accuracy. We show that the best models found with the symbolic regression approach outperform these established models in the cases considered. • We show that the Multi-Layer-Perceptron black-box approach outperforms the empirical and derived equations, especially for extreme events. Highlighting the complex dynamics in the Earth’s magnetosphere and the cost of simplified models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pennati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d21d6127c7a504bfea9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2026.102821
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper