PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026International Journal for Parasitology Parasites and Wildlife0 citationsOpen Access

Impact of habitat modifications on flea (Siphonaptera) infestation dynamics of non-volant small mammals across wildlife-human interfaces in Tanzania

View Full Paper
VMVenance Theophil MsoffeFMFesto K. MwombekiCTClaus Thomas

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how human-induced habitat modifications affect flea populations in non-volant small mammals.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study in Iringa and Morogoro regions of Tanzania.
  • Captured small mammals using Sherman and wire-cage traps.
  • Extracted fleas morphologically and confirmed species through mtDNA sequencing.
  • Applied Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial and Generalized Linear Models for statistical analysis.
  • Decreased small mammal diversity was associated with increased habitat modification.
  • Flea infestation loads rose from bush to peridomestic habitats.
  • Aethomys spp. showed the highest flea prevalence at 38.5%.
  • Infestation was higher during the rainy season with p-value = 0.003 and prevalent in peridomestic areas with p-value = 0.014.

Abstract

Changes in natural habitats affect the population density of small mammals, which in turn influences ectoparasite populations. This study explores how human-induced habitat modifications impact flea infestations of non-volant small mammals considering seasonal and agroecological variations. A cross-sectional study focused on two wildlife–human interfaces in the Iringa and Morogoro regions, Tanzania. Small mammals were captured using Sherman®, Havahart, and wire-cage live traps. Fleas were extracted from the animals' fur with a stiff brush and preserved in 70% alcohol. Flea identification was performed morphologically by using standard guidelines and confirmed by sequencing the mtDNA segment of the cox2 gene. Statistical analyses were performed using Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) and Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) to examine variations in flea infestations across different host species, habitat types, seasons, and agroecological zones. Species diversity of small mammals decreased with increasing habitat modification (bush > farm > peridomestic). The most common rat fleas ( Xenopsylla cheopis , Xenopsylla brasiliensis) , together with chicken flea ( Echidnophaga gallinacea ) and cat flea ( Ctenocephalides felis ), were identified. Flea infestation loads on small mammals increased along the habitat modification gradient (bush < farm < peridomestic). The highest prevalence and mean intensity of infestation were observed in Aethomys spp. at 38.5% (95% CI: 33.7- 43.7) and 2.95 (95% CI: 2.18 - 3.72, SE: 0.366), respectively. Despite Mastomys natalensis being the most abundant, they had a lower prevalence of flea infestation. Flea infestations were significantly higher during the rainy season than the dry season ( p -value = 0.003) and more prevalent in peridomestic habitats than others ( p -value = 0.014). Thus, habitat modification directly impacts flea infestation loads and small mammal species’ diversity, potentially implicating zoonotic disease transmission. This highlights the urgent need for integrated wildlife conservation and public health management approaches in Tanzania. • Habitat modification through anthropogenic activities alters small mammal diversity and flea infestation dynamics at wildlife-human interfaces. • Flea infestation loads increased along a habitat modification gradient from bushland to peridomestic areas. • Medical and veterinary important flea species ( Xenopsylla , Echidnophaga , Ctenocephalides ) were detected using morphological and molecular tools. • Fleas' prevalence and intensity were significantly higher during the rainy season and in peridomestic habitats. • Human-driven landscape changes may elevate zoonotic disease risks, underscoring One Health-based interventions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Msoffe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d55d6127c7a504c012chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2026.101215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper