PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026The Holocene0 citationsOpen Access

Organic carbon burial and sediment accumulation in the fjords of South Georgia, sub-Antarctic

View Full Paper
WSWitold SzczucińskiWMWojciech Majewski

Key Points

  • To quantify organic carbon burial rates and sediment accumulation in the fjords of South Georgia, and understand their role in the carbon cycle.
  • Collected 10 sediment cores from various fjords in South Georgia.
  • Measured sediment accumulation rates using 210 Pb dating.
  • Analyzed total organic carbon content and sediment properties.
  • Sediment accumulation rates ranged from 2.1 to 14.9 mm/yr.
  • Total organic carbon varied from 0.28% to 2.1%.
  • Modern organic carbon burial rates reached 64.6 gOC/m2/yr, suggesting high efficiency in carbon trapping.

Abstract

Fjords are among the most efficient marine environments for trapping sediments and organic carbon (OC). They represent an important part of the global carbon cycle. Yet, quantitative data on OC burial rates are scarce in the Southern Hemisphere. Here, we present 210 Pb-derived sediment accumulation rates (SAR), OC burial rates, and sediment properties from 10 sediment cores collected in the fjords of South Georgia, the largest sub-Antarctic island: Antarctic Bay, Fortuna Bay, Stromness Bay, and Cumberland Bay. SARs range from 2.1 ± 0.4 to 14.9 ± 2.8 mm/yr, total organic carbon (TOC) from 0.28% to 2.1%, and modern OC burial rates from 17.4 ± 1.2 to 64.6 ± 12.1 gOC/m 2 /yr, placing them towards the upper range of values reported globally. High rates reflect large sediment supply from steep, glacierised catchments, intense precipitation, and relatively high primary productivity. A strong relationship between SAR and OC burial rate indicates sediment delivery as the primary control, with the highest modern OC burial rate at a glacier-proximal site combining the highest SAR and lowest TOC. Tidewater glacier-fed fjords show higher SAR and OC burial rates than river-dominated systems. However, the maximum recorded burial rate (95.9 ± 8.3 gOC/m 2 /yr) occurred in King Edward Cove during the early 20th century, driven by the whaling industry, while the modern value (55.5 ± 4.8) is about half. These results suggest that OC burial in tidewater glacier-dominated fjords may increase in the short term under warming due to enhanced meltwater discharge, but decline in the longer term as retreat transforms fjords into river-dominated systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Szczuciński et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d8dd6127c7a504c0749https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836261422213
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1High rates of marine organic carbon burial on the southwest Greenland margin induced by Neoglacial advances2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Burial of Organic Carbon in Swedish Fjord Sediments: Highlighting the Importance of Sediment Accumulation Rate in Relation to Fjord Redox Conditions2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Carbon burial in two Greenland fjords shows no direct link to glacier type2026
  4. 4Organic Carbon Fluxes on Seasonal to Decennial Timescales in Patagonia's Largest River‐Fjord System2025
  5. 5Catchment lithology controls net carbon balance along the Antarctic Peninsula2026