PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation0 citations

Evaluating Multiconfigurational Trials for Accurate Phaseless Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo on 3d Transition Metal Complexes

View Full Paper
HVHung VuongAMAnkit MahajanJWJohn L. Weber

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate multiconfigurational trial wave functions for improving ph-AFQMC results.
  • Benchmarked ionization potentials for 22 3d transition metal complexes against high-accuracy values.
  • Computed ionization potentials for six metallocenes using the best-performing protocol.
  • Analyzed the performance of multiple theoretical approaches including CCSD(T) and DLPNO-CCSD(T1).
  • Examined various extrapolation schemes to achieve complete-basis-set limits.
  • Ph-AFQMC with the best multiconfigurational trial yielded small experimental deviations.
  • CISD trial state in ph-AFQMC achieved errors less than 2 kcal/mol, offering superior accuracy.
  • The methods showed a good balance of accuracy and computational cost for transition metal complexes.

Abstract

In this study, we evaluate multiconfigurational trial wave function protocols for phaseless auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) on transition metal containing systems. First, we benchmark vertical ionization potentials for 22 3d transition metal complexes against published high-accuracy ph-AFQMC values in a double-ζ basis set. We then compute the vertical ionization potential for a set of six metallocenes using our best-performing protocol, alongside ph-AFQMC using a configuration interaction singles and doubles (CISD) trial state. We also analyze the performance of canonical coupled-cluster theory with singles, doubles and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)), as well as its local approximation using domain-based local pair natural orbitals (DLPNO-CCSD(T1)) using different reference orbitals. To reach the complete-basis-set (CBS) limit, we examine several extrapolation schemes and report CBS-limit ph-AFQMC and CCSD(T) values alongside experimental results. We find that ph-AFQMC with the best-performing trial in a triple-ζ basis, followed by CBS correction from DLPNO-CCSD(T1) with unrestricted B3LYP reference orbitals, yields small deviations from experiment at modest cost. Using a CISD trial state in ph-AFQMC gives the closest agreement with experiment (errors <2 kcal/mol), albeit with lower scalability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vuong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d9bd6127c7a504c086ehttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01936
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper