PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces0 citations

In Situ Construction of High-Density Mesopores in Monolithic Catalysts with Enhanced Mass Transport for Hydrogen Production from Methanol Steam Reforming

View Full Paper
QLQing LuHSHongyuan SunWLWenzhen Li

Key Points

  • To develop monolithic catalysts with a high-density mesoporous structure for enhanced hydrogen production from methanol steam reforming.
  • Utilized a low-temperature pore-construction strategy to fabricate catalysts.
  • Employed an endogenous pore-forming agent and a sesbania gum-derived scaffold.
  • Conducted controlled carbonate decomposition under calcination below 250 °C.
  • Achieved over 99% methanol conversion at 240 °C.
  • Produced hydrogen at a rate of 353.7 mmol/g cat·h.
  • Maintained stable operation for 50 hours.

Abstract

Methanol steam reforming is a promising pathway for distributed hydrogen production, but its practical deployment is hindered by the structure-transport mismatch in conventionally monoliths, which limits accessibility and effective utilization of active sites. Herein, a low-temperature pore-construction strategy was developed to fabricate monolithic catalysts with a high-density mesoporous architecture via the synergistic action of an endogenous pore-forming agent and a sesbania gum-derived scaffold. Controlled carbonate decomposition under calcination (3)m(OH)n/Ex-250 monolith achieves >99% methanol conversion at 240 °C with a H2 production rate of 353.7 mmol/gcat·h and stable operation over 50 h. Temperature-programmed desorption analyses of CH3OH and H2O further suggest that the high-density mesoporous architecture enhances reactant accessibility by providing abundant and readily accessible adsorption sites within the monolith. This work highlights a viable route toward architecturally optimized monolithic catalysts for efficient hydrogen production.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91d9bd6127c7a504c0883https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6c01144
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Molecular Design Strategy for Ordered Mesoporous Stoichiometric Metal Oxide2019 · 67 citations
  2. 2Production and testing of technical catalysts based on MnO2 for the abatement of aromatic volatile compounds at the laboratory and pilot plant scales2019 · 14 citations
  3. 3The effects of extrusion processing on rheological and physicochemical properties of sesbania gum2018 · 57 citations
  4. 4In Situ Spectroscopic Characterization and Theoretical Calculations Identify Partially Reduced ZnO 1− x /Cu Interfaces for Methanol Synthesis from CO 22022 · 126 citations
  5. 5Mechanistic insights into the catalytic methanol steam reforming performance of Cu/ZrO2 catalysts by in situ and operando studies2020 · 92 citations