PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Validating the Chinese Version of the Peer Aggression and Reactive Behavior Questionnaire

The validity and reliability of the Peer Aggression and Reactive Behavior Questionnaire (PARB-Q) – Chinese version

View Full Paper

Authors

STSixiang TaoNMNur Shakila MazalanSGShishun Ge

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Cross-sectional study validates the Peer Aggression and Reactive Behavior Questionnaire in Chinese children, suggesting reliability and effectiveness for assessment.

Key Points

  • The study aims to validate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Peer Aggression and Reactive Behavior Questionnaire.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study with 758 students aged 11–15 from Anhui Province, China.
  • Utilized exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to evaluate the questionnaire's structure.
  • Sample was randomly divided into two subsamples for analysis.
  • Confirmed a one-factor structure for the Peer Aggression Scale.
  • Established a three-factor structure for the Reaction to Peer Aggression Scale.
  • Both scales demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.79–0.86).
  • Indicated minimal gender differences, with females scoring higher on internalizing reactions.
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91db5d6127c7a504c0c82https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2026.2624792
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper