PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Principle of Inherent Human Dignity in International Human Rights Law: Philosophical Foundations, Legal Codification, and the Challenge of Cultural Relativism

View Full Paper
SSShiv Shakti Singh ShekhawatRGRohan Rajeev Ghosh

Key Points

  • The chapter explores how human dignity underpins international human rights law from historical and philosophical perspectives.
  • Analyzed philosophical origins of human dignity from ancient to modern thought.
  • Examined codification in international legal instruments.
  • Discussed cultural relativism and its implications on human dignity.
  • Established human dignity as the source of fundamental human rights.
  • Illustrated universal nature of dignity across cultures.
  • Highlighted acknowledgment of cultural diversity in human rights instruments.

Abstract

The notion of human dignity serves as the foundational principle of modern international human rights law and acts as the normative cornerstone of global bioethics. This chapter explores the philosophical progression of human dignity, tracing its origins from ancient Greek and Stoic thought through Christian theology to Enlightenment philosophy, thereby illustrating how the concept has been articulated throughout various intellectual traditions. The analysis examines how dignity, defined as the inherent and inalienable worth that is equally possessed by all members of the human family, emerged as the organizing principle of the international legal order established post-World War II, first enshrined in the United Nations Charter (1945) and later in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). It is established in this chapter that human dignity serves as the ultimate source from which fundamental human rights are derived, rather than being classified as a right itself. This foundational relationship elucidates that rights exist due to individuals' intrinsic worth, independent of state endorsement. The inherent and universal nature of dignity necessitates equal treatment and prohibits discrimination, thus providing the normative framework for safeguarding human integrity against potentially detrimental biotechnological advancements. In addressing the critique of cultural relativism, the chapter illustrates that while human dignity has been systematically developed within Western philosophy, analogous concepts are present in non-Western traditions, including Confucianism and Islam. International human rights instruments, notably the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (2005), acknowledge cultural diversity while asserting that cultural practices cannot override fundamental human rights principles. The chapter concludes by affirming that human dignity functions as a unifying transcultural principle, facilitating the establishment of minimal common bioethical standards while honouring legitimate cultural variations in their application.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shekhawat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91dd2d6127c7a504c1082https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18842986
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper