PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Methodological review of the design, objectives and sample size of Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) applications that use an external randomised controlled pilot trial design: A protocol

View Full Paper
CCClaire L. ChanSESaskia EddyJHJennie Hejdenberg

Key Points

  • This review aims to analyze the design and funding aspects of external pilot trial applications submitted to the RfPB programme.
  • Conducted a review of 100 applications from RfPB Competitions 31–37 with a randomised feasibility design.
  • Screened applications to identify external pilot trials and extracted data on design features and funding outcomes.
  • Performed validation on 20% of the extracted data to resolve discrepancies through consensus.
  • Employed descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data.
  • Identified characteristics of fundable versus non-fundable external pilot trial applications.
  • Provided insights into the impact of sample size justifications on funding success.
  • Developed a guidance document for researchers to improve the quality of pilot trial applications.

Abstract

Background The National Institute for Health and Care Research accepts applications for pilot and feasibility studies to their Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme. There has been limited work describing the design practices of these applications and funding status. Knowing some of the qualities which may contribute towards a pilot or feasibility study application successfully gaining funding could help researchers improve the quality of their applications. Therefore, this study describes the protocol for a review looking at the characteristics of funded and non-funded external pilot trial applications. In particular, the primary objective is to describe the planned sample size and sample size justifications. Methods The study will be conducted on 100 applications from Competition 31–37 with a randomised feasibility design, identified and given access to us by RfPB where the lead applicant has consented. We will screen these applications to identify the external pilot trials, first looking through the titles and then the full text. Following this, we will extract data on information such as medical area, study design, objective(s), sample size, sample size justification, and funding outcome stage one and two. Validation will be performed on 20% of the data extracted; discrepancies will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer will decide if there is no consensus. We will use descriptive statistics to summarise quantitative data, and will analyse qualitative data using thematic analysis. Findings will be summarised through discussion with the project contributors to produce a reader-friendly guidance document. Discussion This work will provide a more complete picture of RfPB external randomised pilot and feasibility trials. The findings will assist researchers when planning their pilot trials, and could help improve the quality of submitted applications. Protocol Registration Open Science Framework protocol registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PYKVG .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91de0d6127c7a504c11bdhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343981
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper