PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026The Chaucer Review0 citations

Character and Control in Troilus and Criseyde

View Full Paper
JTJoseph Turner

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how Chaucer utilizes Geoffrey of Vinsauf's rhetoric to enhance psychological characterization in his poem.
  • Textual analysis of Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde and Geoffrey of Vinsauf's Poetria nova
  • Examination of character interactions, particularly focusing on Pandarus, Troilus, and Criseyde
  • Analysis of specific passages illustrating rhetorical motifs
  • Chaucer's rhetorical control motifs reveal complex psychological depths in his characters.
  • Pandarus's rhetoric is shown to have limitations when contrasted with genuine feelings of Troilus and Criseyde.
  • The effectiveness of Diomede's rhetoric is highlighted in contrast to the unscripted, emotional interactions between Troilus and Criseyde.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although Chaucer’s citation of Geoffrey of Vinsauf’s Poetria nova in Troilus and Criseyde has been frequently acknowledged, it has rarely been considered a potential source for the poem’s rich psychological characterization. This article argues that Chaucer repurposes Geoffrey’s advice on careful rhetorical control as a motif for investigating and illustrating psychological interiority in his major characters. The limitations of Pandarus’s model of rhetorical control are exposed through the unscripted scenes of Troilus and Criseyde’s initial infatuation and through the “sodeyn” success of Diomede’s rhetoric in Book 5.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joseph Turner (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91df9d6127c7a504c15a2https://doi.org/10.5325/chaucerrev.61.2.0261
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper