PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026F1000Research0 citationsOpen Access

An Evidence-Based DIPPO Evaluation Model for the Implementation of Project-Based Learning (P5) to Enhance 21st-Century Skills and Work Readiness

CLChristiana Niken LarasatiASAw SurantoERE. Rohaeti

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the implementation of Project-Based Learning (P5) and its effects on students' competencies using an evidence-based approach.
  • Employed a mixed-methods evaluative design using quantitative and qualitative data.
  • Collected quantitative data through structured questionnaires and pre–post skill assessments.
  • Gathered qualitative insights via interviews, observations, and document analysis.
  • Applied the DIPPO framework for structured evaluation: Design, Input, Process, Product, Outcome.
  • Utilized statistical analyses including paired-sample t-tests and ANOVA for data interpretation.
  • Demonstrated significant improvements in all measured 21st-century skills with medium to large effect sizes (p < .001).
  • Revealed strong performance across Design, Process, Product, and Outcome dimensions of the DIPPO framework.
  • Identified lower scores in the Input dimension, indicating resource and capacity gaps.
  • Stakeholder comparisons showed significant differences in perceptions of input readiness, highlighting areas for improvement.
  • Confirmed the DIPPO Evaluation Model as an effective framework for supporting decision-making in curriculum development.

Abstract

The implementation of Project-Based Learning through the Pancasila Student Profile Strengthening Project (P5) has been widely promoted to foster 21st-century skills and work readiness. However, systematic and decision-oriented evaluation models capable of generating evidence-based insights for curriculum improvement remain limited. This study addresses this gap by applying an Evidence-Based DIPPO Evaluation Model to assess the implementation of P5 and its impact on students’ competencies. This research employed a mixed-methods evaluative design based on a pilot (preliminary) study involving students, teachers, and school administrators. The evaluation was structured around the DIPPO framework (Design, Input, Process, Product, Outcome). Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires and pre–post skill assessments, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Descriptive statistics, paired-sample t -tests, ANOVA, effect size analysis, and data triangulation were used to support evidence-based interpretation. The findings indicate strong performance in the Design, Process, Product, and Outcome dimensions, demonstrating high conceptual alignment, implementation fidelity, and positive learning outputs. Significant pre–post improvements were observed across all measured 21st-century skills, including critical thinking, collaboration, communication, creativity, and work readiness ( p

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Larasati et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91df9d6127c7a504c160dhttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.177033.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper