Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 5, 2026Health Economics Policy and LawOpen Access

Acting reactively: private investment, controversies and regulatory and policy responses in residential long-term care in Ontario (Canada), Lombardy (Italy), the Netherlands and England (United Kingdom)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JSJitse SchuurmansLBL De BrabandereMCMichele Castelli

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Analysis of policy responses to private investment controversies in residential long-term care across Ontario, Lombardy, the Netherlands, and England, highlighting reactive approaches.

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how policymakers and regulators respond to private investment in residential long-term care and the resulting controversies.
  • Analysis of policies regarding private investment in residential long-term care
  • Examination of stakeholder dynamics between asset holders and other stakeholders
  • Comparison of responses across Ontario, Lombardy, the Netherlands, and England
  • Policymakers respond reactively to controversies concerning quality and affordability of care.
  • Growing power struggles are identified between asset holders and stakeholders in the sector.
  • The institutional context significantly influences the regulatory responses to private investment.

Cite This Study

Schuurmans et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e1fd6127c7a504c1c91https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133126100401
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share