The pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is hampered by a persistent lack of a rigorous, operational definition, leaving the field reliant on aspirational descriptions and narrow behavioral benchmarks. This paper argues that a viable path forward requires moving beyond functional mimicry to a formal structural definition. We propose a framework that defines AGI not by what it can do (i.e., pass a specific test), but by what it is: an integrated cognitive architecture composed of a set of core, non-negotiable properties. We deconstruct general intelligence into its fundamental architectural components: a hybrid reasoning engine supporting logical, intuitive, and simulative cognition; a memory system designed for both long-term knowledge conservation and dynamic adaptation; intrinsic agency enabling autonomous goal-setting and execution; and metacognitive capabilities for self-reflection and continuous improvement. We posit that these properties are not an optional checklist but form an interdependent system where intelligence emerges from their synthesis. This structural approach provides a more robust foundation for the field than existing definitions. It establishes a clear engineering blueprint for constructing AGI, offers a principled methodology for evaluating progress based on architectural milestones rather than task-specific performance, and reframes the discourse from chasing an elusive concept to building a verifiable system.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Derikiants et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e4cd6127c7a504c2236 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18766832
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
Leonid Derikiants
Vasily Mazin
Simulation Technologies (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...