PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry0 citations

Fractal analysis of mandibular bone in children with delayed formation or agenesis of the mandibular second premolar germ

View Full Paper

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine how delayed formation or absence of the mandibular second premolar germ impacts mandibular trabecular bone structure in children.
  • Evaluated two groups: delayed formation (n = 24) and agenesis (n = 24), age- and sex-matched.
  • Utilized standardized panoramic radiographs processed through ImageJ for fractal dimension (FD) analysis.
  • Calculated FD values for furcation area and mandibular angulus.
  • No significant age or gender differences between the groups at FD analysis.
  • Both groups displayed higher FD values in the mandibular angulus compared to the furcation area (p < 0.05).
  • No significant differences in FD values between the delayed formation and agenesis groups (p > 0.05).

Abstract

Background: The presence of dental developmental anomalies, such as hypodontia or delayed tooth germ formation, is a common etiological factor contributing to malocclusion. Understanding whether these anomalies affect mandibular trabecular bone structure is crucial for risk assessment and interceptive orthodontic planning. This study aimed to evaluate whether delayed formation or congenital absence of the mandibular second premolar germ alters the trabecular architecture of the mandible in children and adolescents. Methods: Two groups were studied (n = 48): delayed formation group (n = 24) and agenesis group (n = 24), age- and sex-matched at fractal dimension (FD) analysis. Standardized panoramic radiographs were processed using ImageJ software to calculate FD values for two regions of interest: the furcation area and the mandibular angulus. Results: There were no significant differences in age or gender between the groups at the time of FD analysis (mean age = 5.75 years in both groups). No significant differences in FD values were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, both groups exhibited significantly higher FD values in the mandibular angulus region compared with the furcation area (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results suggest that the distinction between delayed formation and agenesis of the mandibular second premolar germ was not associated with major differences. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to further explore the relationship between trabecular architecture and dental developmental anomalies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

A 2026 study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e57d6127c7a504c23aehttps://doi.org/10.22514/jocpd.2026.039
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Anatomical Evaluation of Localized Mandibular Trabecular Texture Differences in Children with Hypodontia Using Radiographic Fractal Analysis2026
  2. 2Evaluation of mandibular trabecular bone by fractal analysis in pediatric patients with hypodontia of the mandibular second premolar tooth2024 · 13 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of bone changes in patients born premature using mandibular indices and fractal dimension analysis on dental panoramic radiographs2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4Analysis of mandibular trabecular bone by fractal analysis in children born with oral cleft2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Evaluation of the Fractal Dimension in the Apical Region of Primary Teeth with Unilateral and Bilateral Infraocclusion2024 · 1 citations