PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Molar distalization and stability following maxillary anterior teeth alignment with class II elastics and a 10-day aligner protocol

BSBadr Sultan SaifYTYu TangWBWen-qing Bu

Key Points

  • To compare the anticipated and actual outcomes of maxillary anterior teeth alignment and molar distalization, and assess molar stability.
  • Sample included 30 individuals with digital models obtained at three treatment stages (T0, T1, T2).
  • Intra-oral scanner was utilized for precise measurements.
  • Maxillary molars and upper anterior teeth were evaluated for movement and alignment changes.
  • Significant differences were found between predicted and actual molar distalization (P < 0.001).
  • The accuracy of molar distalization decreased to 48.25% by the end of treatment (T0-T2).
  • Average posterior anchorage loss was reported at 34.02% and anterior teeth alignment showed a mean accuracy of 54.79%.

Abstract

This study compares the anticipated maxillary anterior teeth alignment and molar distal movement with the actual results. The molar stability after anterior teeth alignment has also been investigated. The sample consisted of 30 individuals. Three digital models were obtained using an intra-oral scanner before treatment (T0), after maxillary molar distalization (T1), and at the treatment end, before refinement (T2). The digital models were registered over the palatal rugae area. 120 maxillary molars were investigated for distal movement and anchorage loss. Also, 180 upper anterior teeth were evaluated for anterior teeth alignment. After maxillary molar distalization, the predicted distalization of maxillary molars significantly differed from the actual clinical values (P < 0.001) with a mean percentage accuracy of 75.3% (T0-T1). During T0-T2 stage, anterior teeth showed a significant difference between the two variables except for the labial movement of the lateral incisor (p = 0.056) and canine (p = 0.167). Also, lingual torque of the lateral incisor (p = 0.190). For anterior tooth alignment, the overall mean accuracy was 54.79%. At the treatment end before refinement, the average percentage of posterior anchorage loss was 34.02% and the average percentage accuracy of molar distalization decreased to 48.25% (T0-T2). While clear aligners are an effective modality for maxillary molar distalization in non-growing adults, their accuracy in achieving anterior tooth alignment is limited. Clinicians should account for significant posterior anchorage loss and anticipate challenges in achieving precise lingual movement of the anterior teeth during treatment planning.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saif et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6ee2531e4c4a9ff59094https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42045-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of Clear Aligners on Sequential Maxillary Molar Distalization: Discrepancy between Treatment Goal and Outcome2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Analysis of the efficacy of conventional, skeletal and invisible orthodontic appliance for upper molar distalization in Class II Malocclusion patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis2025
  3. 3CBCT assessment of maxillary molar distalization and root length changes during clear aligner therapy2026
  4. 4Assessment of the Effectiveness and Predictability of Maxillary Molar Distalization with Clear Aligner Systems: A Systematic Review of the Literature2026
  5. 5Evaluating anchorage loss in upper incisors during distalization of maxillary posterior teeth using clear aligners in adult patients: A prospective randomized study2024 · 10 citations