PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026BMC Public Health1 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and epidemiological patterns of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in Canada, 1969–2025: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
MHManale HarfoucheWeill Cornell Medical College in QatarAKAmmar KhanWeill Cornell Medical College in QatarATAmr TahaWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar

Key Points

  • The aim is to synthesize evidence on the prevalence and patterns of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in Canada over several decades.
  • Conducted a systematic review of studies published up to August 7, 2025.
  • Followed the Cochrane framework and PRISMA guidelines.
  • Performed random-effects meta-analyses to generate pooled prevalence estimates.
  • Used meta-regression analyses to identify associations and sources of heterogeneity.
  • Analyzed data from 136 publications covering 226 prevalence measures from 1969 to 2025.
  • Overall pooled prevalence for urogenital infection in the general population was 1.0%.
  • Among men who have sex with men, urogenital prevalence was 0.9%, anorectal was 2.6%, and oropharyngeal was 1.6%.
  • In STI clinic attendees, urogenital presence was 7.5%, anorectal was 2.5%, and oropharyngeal was 5.0%.
  • Symptomatic women's prevalence was 15.9% and men's was 37.4%.
  • Meta-regression analyses highlighted long-term decline and variation based on population type.

Abstract

Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection remains a concern due to its morbidity and increasing antimicrobial resistance. This study synthesized evidence on NG prevalence in Canada, examining epidemiological patterns across populations and anatomical sites, temporal trends, and key associations. A systematic review of NG prevalence studies published up to August 7, 2025, was conducted following the Cochrane framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Random-effects meta-analyses generated pooled prevalence estimates, while random-effects meta-regression analyses identified associations and sources of heterogeneity. A total of 136 publications contributed 226 prevalence measures spanning 1969–2025. In the general population, the pooled mean prevalence of urogenital infection was 1.0% (95% CI: 0.5–1.5%). Among men who have sex with men, pooled prevalence was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.2–1.9%) for urogenital, 2.6% (95% CI: 0.9–4.9%) for anorectal, and 1.6% (95% CI: 0.2–3.8%) for oropharyngeal infection. Among STI clinic attendees, prevalence was 7.5% (95% CI: 4.2–11.6%) for urogenital, 2.5% (95% CI: 0.7–5.3%) for anorectal, and 5.0% (95% CI: 1.8–9.6%) for oropharyngeal infection. Prevalence was high among symptomatic populations—15.9% (95% CI: 4.0–33.2%) in women and 37.4% (95% CI: 11.1–68.6%) in men. Meta-regression analyses explained over half of the variation in prevalence, showing a long-term decline, a gradient by population type, and a small-study effect, but no differences by age, sex, or province. NG prevalence in Canada mirrors global levels and patterns. The persistence of infection underscores the need for sustained prevention, enhanced surveillance—including extragenital screening—and continued research to inform policy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harfouche et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6f0d531e4c4a9ff59235https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-26579-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper