PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026BMC Geriatrics0 citationsOpen Access

No incremental discriminative value of hemoglobin beyond GNRI for predicting mortality in older adult with sepsis

XDXiao-Yan DingLZLi-Juan ZengJZJing-Ru Zhang

Key Points

  • To explore the prognostic value of the hemoglobin-combined Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (H-GNRI) for predicting mortality in older adults with sepsis.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database
  • Included older adults with sepsis aged ≥ 65 years
  • Developed the H-GNRI scoring system via optimal cutoffs for GNRI and hemoglobin
  • Applied propensity score matching to reduce confounding variables
  • Used Cox proportional hazards models and ROC analysis to assess prognostic performance
  • 28-day mortality rates were significantly different across risk groups (45.0%, 61.7%, 72.5% for low, intermediate, and high risk)
  • Higher-risk H-GNRI groups were independently linked to increased mortality risk after adjustments
  • H-GNRI showed poor discriminatory performance (AUC of 0.58) for predicting 28-day mortality

Abstract

The prognostic value of hemoglobin-combined Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (H-GNRI) in older adult septic patients remain unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the association between H-GNRI and both short-term and long-term mortality in older adult patients with sepsis. This retrospective cohort study analyzed older adult with sepsis from the MIMIC-IV database. Patients aged ≥ 65 years meeting sepsis-3 criteria were included, excluding those with chronic kidney disease or severe liver disease. The H-GNRI scoring system was developed by combining optimal cutoff values for GNRI and hemoglobin determined through X-tile analysis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to minimize confounding. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Cox proportional hazards models and ROC analysis were used to evaluate prognostic performance and discriminatory ability. The 28-day mortality rates increased significantly across risk groups (45.0%, 61.7%, and 72.5% for low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively; P < 0.001). This trend persisted for 180-day and 1-year mortality. After adjusting for confounders, higher-risk H-GNRI groups remained independently associated with increased mortality risk. However, H-GNRI demonstrated poor discriminatory performance with an AUC of 0.58 for 28-day mortality prediction. While H-GNRI demonstrated significant associations with mortality in older adult sepsis patients, it exhibited poor discriminatory performance, limiting its utility as a standalone risk prediction tool. Further studies are needed to develop more sophisticated nutritional risk stratification approaches for critically ill patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ding et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6f0d531e4c4a9ff59276https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07262-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Tailoring nutrition therapy to illness and recovery2017 · 127 citations
  2. 2Predictive Value of the Hemoglobin-Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients with Heart Failure2023 · 9 citations
  3. 3Increasing serum iron levels and their role in the risk of infectious diseases: a Mendelian randomization approach2023 · 27 citations
  4. 4Clinical outcomes and financial impacts of malnutrition in sepsis2020 · 16 citations
  5. 5Performance of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in predicting 28-day hospital mortality in older adult patients with sepsis2013 · 80 citations