PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026IET conference proceedings.0 citations

Grid-forming-benchmarking-project – part II: comparative analysis of the properties ‘voltage source properties’ and ‘inertial response’

View Full Paper
PEPhilipp ErnstRDR. DenningerRSRoland Singer

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate and compare the dynamic properties of grid-forming converters focusing on voltage source properties and inertial response.
  • Comprehensive testing procedure developed under the GFM-Benchmarking-Project.
  • Tests conducted in islanded operation to assess dynamic stabilization capability and settling times.
  • Comparison of inertial response using RoCoF-based and load-based approaches.
  • Some converters stabilize in a few milliseconds, while others take up to one grid period.
  • Inertia was generally in line with expectations but showed differences in damping and symmetry.
  • Responses to constant frequency deviations varied among converters.

Abstract

Grid-forming (GFM) converters are considered a key technology to maintain voltage and frequency stability in future power systems with high shares of converter-based generation. However, differences in the implementation of grid-forming controls across manufacturers require systematic testing and comparative assessment. Within the GFM-Benchmarking-Project, initiated by Fraunhofer ISE in cooperation with the four German transmission system operators 50Hertz, Amprion, TenneT and TransnetBW, a comprehensive testing procedure has been developed to evaluate the dynamic properties of GFM converters in a black-box approach. This paper, as the second part of the project results, focuses on two fundamental aspects: the voltage source properties and the inertial response of the converters. For the voltage source properties, tests in islanded operation were performed to evaluate the dynamic stabilization capability and to determine the settling times. The results revealed a wide spread, with some devices stabilizing within only a few milliseconds, while others required up to one grid period. The investigation of the inertial response was conducted using both RoCoF-based (Rate of Change of Frequency) and load-based approaches, enabling a detailed comparison of methods and parameterizations. The converters generally provided inertia in line with the expectations, though differences were observed in damping, symmetry between positive and negative RoCoFs, and response under constant frequency deviations. These findings highlight the need for harmonized performance requirements and standardized testing procedures, ensuring that GFM converters can be reliably integrated into future power systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ernst et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6f0d531e4c4a9ff592a1https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.4527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper