PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Blockchain Research and Applications1 citationsOpen Access

Machine learning methods for fraud detection within Ethereum blockchain—A review

View Full Paper
JCJoão CrisóstomoFBFernando BaçãoVLVictor Lobo

Key Points

  • The aim is to review machine learning techniques used for fraud detection in the Ethereum blockchain.
  • Comprehensive analysis of various machine learning models
  • Overview of datasets and feature engineering techniques
  • Identification of challenges and limitations in current approaches
  • Exploration of deep learning architectures and hybrid models
  • Examination of active learning and genetic programming applications
  • Effective machine learning methods were identified for detecting Ethereum fraud
  • Significant challenges include data availability and model interpretability
  • Potential advancements could enhance Ethereum's resilience and security

Abstract

This review explores the application of machine learning techniques for fraud detection and prevention in the Ethereum blockchain. As a leading platform for decentralized applications (dApps), Ethereum is vulnerable to fraudulent activities such as scams, hacking attempts, and malicious transactions. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of machine learning models used to predict, detect, and mitigate fraudulent behavior within the Ethereum ecosystem. By overviewing various machine learning methods, this study identifies the most effective approaches for addressing different types of vulnerabilities while offering a thorough review of existing research, key challenges, and limitations. It also examines the datasets and feature engineering techniques applied in this domain, outlining future directions and potential strategies for improving fraud detection. While machine learning has enhanced Ethereum’s security, challenges such as data availability, adversarial attacks, and model interpretability remain significant concerns. To address these gaps, this study highlights the potential of integrating deep learning architectures, graph representations, and hybrid models that combine supervised and unsupervised learning. Additionally, it explores the use of active learning and genetic programming to further enhance fraud detection capabilities. Furthermore, leveraging AI, particularly through large language models, could improve interpretability at the account, block, or transaction level, offering a clearer, more comprehensive view of fraudulent behavior across the Ethereum network. By tackling these challenges, future advancements in machine learning could further strengthen the resilience, security, and trustworthiness of Ethereum’s infrastructure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Crisóstomo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6f0d531e4c4a9ff59314https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2026.100469
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systematic Review of Security Vulnerabilities in Ethereum Blockchain Smart Contract2022 · 347 citations
  2. 2The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews2021 · 11,851 citations
  3. 3Analyzing a Portion of the ROC Curve1989 · 724 citations
  4. 4A Machine Learning based Approach to Detect the Ethereum Fraud Transactions with Limited Attributes2022 · 47 citations
  5. 5Detection of illicit accounts over the Ethereum blockchain2020 · 283 citations