PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Surgical vs. nonsurgical treatment of extra-articular scapula fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

LSLara StehlingERElena RickerLKLisa Klute

Key Points

  • To compare outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of extra-articular scapula fractures based on fracture type.
  • Systematic search of databases for relevant studies on scapula fractures
  • Independent double screening by reviewers for study selection
  • Classification of fractures into scapular neck, body, and floating shoulder
  • Assessment of outcomes using standardized scores
  • No significant difference in outcomes for scapular neck fractures (P = .62)
  • Trend favoring surgery observed in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score for scapular body fractures (P = .05)
  • Similar Constant Scores between nonsurgical management and clavicle fixation alone for floating shoulder injuries; higher scores noted for combined fixation (87.0; P = .14)

Abstract

Background: Scapula fractures are historically managed conservatively. Although surgical treatment has become increasingly common and is associated with favorable outcomes, comparative studies of surgical vs. nonsurgical management remain scarce. To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first systematic comparison of outcomes in extra-articular scapula fractures according to fracture localization. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were systematically searched in April 2024 for studies on extra-articular scapula fractures. Two reviewers independently conducted a two-stage screening process. Patients were grouped into scapular neck, scapular body, and floating shoulder fractures, each stratified by surgical or nonsurgical management. Surgically treated floating shoulder injuries were further categorized by clavicle fixation alone or combined scapula–clavicle fixation. Outcomes included the Constant Score (CS), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Results: Twenty-six studies including 601 patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistical difference was observed for scapular neck fractures (P = .62; mean CS: surgical 93.6 vs. nonsurgical 89.6). In scapular body fractures, CS differences were not significant, while Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores showed a trend favoring surgery (P = .05; surgical 5.9 vs. nonsurgical 12.8). For floating shoulder injuries, CSs were similar between nonsurgical management (77.3) and clavicle fixation alone (76.7), whereas combined scapula–clavicle fixation yielded higher scores (87.0; P = .14). Conclusion: Surgical intervention for extra-articular scapular fractures showed no significant overall benefit, though floating shoulder injuries trended toward clinically meaningful improvement. Current evidence is limited by heterogeneity, highlighting the need for high-quality prospective studies to guide optimal management

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stehling et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7008531e4c4a9ff595e0https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.78847
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper