PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Bioresource Technology2 citationsOpen Access

Influence of biochar and zeolite on biochemical methane potential in saline aquaculture sludge

View Full Paper
ASAbdullah Bugra SenolLSLinn SolliJMJohn Morken

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the impact of biochar and zeolite on methane production from aquaculture sludge under varying salinity levels.
  • Conducted batch biochemical methane potential assays under mesophilic conditions
  • Evaluated aquaculture sludge from recirculating aquaculture systems
  • Applied biochar and zeolite additives at a rate of 0.8 g/g VS
  • Measured methane yields across freshwater, brackish, and marine conditions
  • Methane yields decreased significantly with increasing salinity from freshwater (533.6 NmL/g VS) to marine conditions (341.3 NmL/g VS)
  • Biochar enhanced methane production by 5.9–11.3% across all salinities
  • Zeolite increased methane yields by 7.7% in brackish and 15.7% in marine conditions but had no effect in freshwater
  • Modified Gompertz model effectively described methane production kinetics

Abstract

• Salinity decreased methane yields from freshwater to brackish and marine sludge. • Biochar boosted CH 4 yield by up to 11.3%, best under freshwater. • Zeolite enhanced methane yields in brackish and marine systems but not freshwater. • Targeted additive selection improved anaerobic digestion of aquaculture sludge. Aquaculture sludge from recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS) represents a growing waste stream with potential for biogas recovery; however, elevated salinity can inhibit anaerobic digestion (AD). This study evaluated the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of RAS sludge under freshwater (0%), brackish (1.2%), and marine (3.3%) conditions and assessed the effectiveness of biochar and zeolite. Batch BMP assays were conducted under mesophilic conditions at an inoculum-to-substrate ratio of 2:1, with additives applied at 0.8 g/g VS. Increasing salinity significantly reduced methane yields ( p < 0.05), from 533.6 ± 3.4 NmL CH 4 /g VS in freshwater to 478.1 ± 10.2 and 341.3 ± 0.6 NmL CH 4 /g VS in brackish and marine conditions, respectively. Biochar enhanced methane production by 5.9–11.3% across all salinities, while zeolite increased yields by 7.7% and 15.7% under brackish and marine conditions, respectively, but had no effect in freshwater. Methane production kinetics were well described by the modified Gompertz model (R 2 = 0.983–0.999). Overall, biochar was more effective at low salinity levels, whereas zeolite mitigated salinity-induced inhibition, indicating that targeted additive application can enhance methane recovery from saline aquaculture sludge and support sustainable RAS waste management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Senol et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa701a531e4c4a9ff59997https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134345
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper