PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026˜The œSAIS review of international affairs1 citations

The Geoeconomics of Critical Minerals: Implications of a Trump–Central Asia Framework Agreement

View Full Paper
MOMarsha McGraw Olive

Key Points

  • This research investigates the potential of Central Asia as an alternative source for critical minerals to reduce US dependence on Chinese supplies.
  • Analyzed geoeconomic strategies involving critical minerals and REEs.
  • Examined three Central Asian countries: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan.
  • Evaluated investment opportunities and geopolitical implications.
  • Identified untapped reserves of critical minerals in Central Asia.
  • Found that US investment could mitigate dependence on Chinese exports.
  • Highlighted tensions between China, Russia, and the US in the region.

Abstract

Abstract: China’s aggressive geoeconomic strategy to dominate global supplies of critical minerals and rare earth elements (REEs) prompted President Trump to declare a national emergency and seek alternative sources, including from the vast, untapped reserves of Central Asia. Central Asians are keen to attract American investment while China and Russia want to exclude the United States from the region. I test the hypothesis that private investment in Central Asia to help meet the United States’ accelerating demand is a credible alternative to sourcing from allied democratic states. Three countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan) are examined for access to the critical minerals subject to Chinese export restrictions (gallium, germanium and antimony).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Marsha McGraw Olive (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7066531e4c4a9ff5a1cehttps://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2025.a984723
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper