PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026BMC Cardiovascular Disorders0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease combined with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

MZMeishan ZhangJZJieqiong ZhangYZYinxue Zhang

Key Result

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduced fasting blood glucose by 1.08 mmol/L (95% CI -1.49 to -0.66, P < 0.00001) in patients with coronary heart disease combined with diabetes mellitus.

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with both coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus.
  • Conducted a systematic literature search across multiple databases until December 2025.
  • Included 18 trials with a total of 1669 patients.
  • Analyzed data using fixed-effect and random-effects models and assessed heterogeneity with the I² statistic.
  • Performed subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses.
  • Exercise rehabilitation significantly reduced fasting blood glucose levels (MD -1.08).
  • Improved glycosylated haemoglobin levels by an average of MD -0.47.
  • Total cholesterol levels decreased by MD -0.65 due to exercise interventions.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction increased by MD 5.28, indicating better heart function.
  • No significant effect was observed on peak oxygen uptake.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=1,669)

Structured PICO

Does exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improve glycolipid metabolism, 6-MWT, and LVEF in patients with both coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus?

P
Population
1,669 patients with both coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) pooled from 18 randomized controlled trials.
I
Intervention
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR), primarily aerobic exercise (resistance training included in 33.3% of trials), with frequencies ranging from 3 to 7 times per week and durations of 20 to 60 minutes per session.
C
Comparator
Control group (usual care).
O
Outcome
Fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL).surrogate

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation significantly improves glycolipid metabolism and functional capacity (LVEF, 6-MWT) in patients with concurrent coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus.

Main Result

Effect estimate: MD -1.08 mmol/L (95% CI -1.49 to -0.66)

p-value: p=<0.00001

Limitations

  • Most included studies showed some concerns or high risk of bias, especially in selection of the reported result.
  • Heterogeneity among included studies was substantial for some outcomes.
  • Effect on peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was not significant and remains unclear.
  • Majority of included studies were conducted in China potentially limiting generalizability.
  • Variation in exercise intervention dose and components across studies.
  • limitations in the primary studies
  • considerable heterogeneity
  • publication bias for LVEF and LDL
  • limited number of studies for VO2peak

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces mortality and morbidity in coronary heart disease (CHD). Globally, CHD is the most common reason for referral to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR). However, diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for CHD. We aimed to assess ExCR’s efficacy in patients with both DM and CHD. A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to December 13, 2025, in the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). This review was registered with PROSPERO (Registration No: CRD42024592143). Data synthesis was performed using Stata SE and RevMan 5.3. Pooled estimates were calculated using both fixed-effect and random-effects models; the random-effects model was adopted as the primary analysis when substantial heterogeneity was present (I² ≥ 50%). Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity and to assess the robustness of the primary findings. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. There were 18 trials involving 1669 patients in all. The exercise group reduced fasting blood glucose (FBG) (mean differences (MD) -1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.49 to -0.66, P < 0.00001), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (PBG) (MD -1.59, 95% CI -2.43 to -0.75, P = 0.0002), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (MD -0.47, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.41, P < 0.00001), total cholesterol (TC) (MD -0.65, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.41, P < 0.00001), triglycerides (TG) (MD -0.34, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.28, P < 0.00001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.14, P < 0.00001) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 5.28, 95% CI 1.72 to 8.85; P = 0.004) and 6-minute walk test (6-MWT). Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was not significantly impacted. This review suggests ExCR may improve glycolipid metabolism, 6-MWT, and LVEF in patients with both CHD and DM. However, these findings are tempered by limitations in the primary studies, and the effect on VO2peak remains unclear. The results highlight the need for further high-quality research to confirm the efficacy of ExCR in this population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients with coronary heart disease combined with diabetes mellitus (n=1,669). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) vs. Control group with usual care or no exercise intervention was evaluated on Fasting blood glucose (FBG) (MD -1.08 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.49 to -0.66, p=<0.00001). Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation reduced fasting blood glucose by 1.08 mmol/L (95% CI -1.49 to -0.66, P < 0.00001) in patients with coronary heart disease combined with diabetes mellitus.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7087531e4c4a9ff5a660https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-05606-1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Lipid Levels in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2022 · 24 citations
  2. 2Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Physical Health in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials2021 · 26 citations
  3. 3Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Diabetes Mellitus: Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Options2022 · 97 citations
  4. 4Microvascular Function and Exercise Training: Functional Implication of Nitric Oxide Signaling and Ion Channels2024 · 15 citations
  5. 5The Effect of Technology-Based Home Cardiac Rehabilitation on Risk Factor Modifications in Coronary Heart Disease Patients. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2024 · 8 citations