PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Scientia Agropecuaria0 citationsOpen Access

Sustainable livestock farming: Estimating forage biomass with RPAS and 3D modeling

EEEduardo Tacuri EspinozaMEMateo López EspinozaAHAlberto Macancela Herrera

Key Points

  • The research aims to validate aerial imagery methods against traditional field measurements for grassland parameters and identify the best predictors for grass mass.
  • Collected grass height and volume in the field using a 1 m² frame
  • Measured biomass in laboratory settings
  • Obtained aerial images through RPAS and processed them into digital surface and terrain models
  • Performed linear modeling to evaluate predictive relationships
  • Aerial methods and field methods showed up to 98% data variability (p < 0.0001)
  • Digital height was the best predictor for dry mass (R²: 48%) and fresh mass (R²: 42%)
  • Measures of central tendency and dispersion were similar across methods

Abstract

An alternative to support sustainable and technological livestock farming is using aerial images through Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS). This method has demonstrated effective outcomes in assessing agricultural variables including height, volume, and biomass across vegetation and crops like pastures. The study was carried out at Nero farm in southern Ecuador. The objectives of this research were: i) demonstrate the validity of the aerial imagery method with traditional field methods for characterizing grassland agronomic parameters (height, volume, and biomass) and ii) evaluate which of the variables studied (height and volume) is the best predictor of grass fresh mass and dry mass. The first methodology consists of collecting in filed (paddock) height and volume of grass using a frame of 1 m2, then biomass was measured in laboratory. For the second method, aerial images were obtained through RPAS and processed to generate digital surface model (DSM) and digital terrain model (DTM). Finally, linear models were performed with respective R2 and error. The height and volume of grass of both methods represent up to 98% of data variability (p < 0.0001), also, the measures of central tendency and dispersion were so similar. Regarding the models of fresh and dry mass with height and volume digital of grass representing over 40% (p < 0.05), the digital height being the best predictor for dry (R2: 48%) and fresh mass (R2: 42%). This research revalidates the effectiveness use of aerial images in important crops from Ecuador.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Espinoza et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7096531e4c4a9ff5a83fhttps://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2026.024
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper