PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Multimorbidity in the Brazilian adult population: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence

View Full Paper
CPCristina Camargo PereiraLMLarissa Silva MagalhãesSBSandro Rogério Rodrigues Batista

Key Points

  • The aim is to estimate the pooled prevalence of multimorbidity among Brazilian adults living in the community.
  • Conduct a systematic review of population-based studies on multimorbidity in Brazil.
  • Perform database searches in PubMed, Scopus, and others for relevant studies.
  • Screen articles and assess study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist.
  • Use random-effects models for the meta-analysis with REML estimators for pooled estimates.
  • Conduct subgroup analyses based on age, sex, region, and study type.
  • No existing comprehensive reviews on multimorbidity prevalence in Brazil.
  • Expected to provide pooled prevalence estimates, revealing the extent of multimorbidity in the population.
  • Findings will guide public health strategies to address the burden of chronic conditions.

Abstract

Multimorbidity (MM), defined as the co-occurrence of multiple chronic conditions in a single individual, poses a major challenge to health systems. Its consequences include higher morbidity and mortality rates, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare costs. Despite its substantial public health burden, no systematic reviews have comprehensively assessed the pooled prevalence of MM in Brazil. This manuscript outlines a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at estimating the prevalence of MM among community-dwelling adults in Brazil. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies reporting MM prevalence in community settings. A comprehensive search will be performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and SciELO databases. Two independent reviewers will screen articles, assess study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklist for prevalence studies, and extract data. For the meta-analysis, pooled estimates will be calculated using random-effects models with Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) estimators to account for between-study variability. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I² statistic and Cochran’s Q test. Subgroups analyses (e.g., age group, sex, region, and study type) will be conducted where feasible. Findings will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024389106). This review will provide comprehensive evidence on MM prevalence in Brazil, identifying the burden of this problem for future research and informing public health strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pereira et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7096531e4c4a9ff5a920https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343166
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper