PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

How does the ESG performance expectation gap hinder green sustainable innovation? Dual pathway mediation by financing constraints and human capital

View Full Paper
MTMule TaiQXQuanzhong Xu

Key Points

  • The goal is to understand how gaps in ESG performance expectations affect green sustainable innovation.
  • Analysis of data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2023.
  • Assessment of ESG performance expectation gaps and their effects on innovation.
  • Mediating effect analysis to explore financing constraints and human capital.
  • Significant hindrance of green sustainable innovation due to ESG performance expectation gaps.
  • Increased financing constraints and reduced human capital are key mediators in this relationship.
  • Effects are stronger in non-state-owned enterprises and firms in eastern regions.

Abstract

In the pursuit of sustainable development, green innovation plays a pivotal role in enabling firms to fulfill environmental responsibilities and build sustainable competitive advantages. However, when a firm’s actual environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance falls short of stakeholder expectations, the resulting ESG performance expectation gap may ihinder the green innovation necessary for sustainable development transformation. Although existing research has primarily focused on financial performance expectation gaps, the impact of ESG performance expectation gaps remains underexplored. Using data from Chinese A-share listed companies over the period 2011–2023, this study examines the impact of ESG performance expectation gaps on green sustainable innovation. The findings indicate that ESG performance expectation gaps significantly hinder green sustainable innovation. Mediating effects analysis reveals that this gap hinder green sustainable innovation by heightening financing constraints and reducing human capital. Heterogeneity analyses further show that this inhibitory effect is more pronounced among firms located in eastern regions and non-state-owned enterprises. This study provides both theoretical and empirical support for integrating ESG governance with innovation strategies to enhance sustainable competitiveness, suggesting that narrowing such gaps can strengthen corporate resilience and collaborative innovation capacity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70e7531e4c4a9ff5b1d0https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2026.2636233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) performance expectation gap on corporations’ green technology innovation in China2026
  2. 2Impact of Enterprise ESG Performance on Innovation Capacity: Based on the Mediating Effect of Financing Constraints2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Does Corporate ESG Performance Enhance Sustained Green Innovation? Empirical Evidence from China2025 · 8 citations
  4. 4The Impact of Corporate ESG Performance on Green Innovation Efficiency —— Evidence from China2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Can ESG performance promote corporate green innovation in China? Micro evidence from innovation element-driven perspective2026