PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20260 citations

Outcomes of Bridging Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma Receiving Third-Line CAR T.

View Full Paper
IGInna Y GongMJMeenakshi JeevaKHKatrina Hueniken

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of various bridging therapy modalities in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma prior to CAR T therapy.
  • Included patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL for third-line CD19-directed CAR T at Princess Margaret Cancer Center (2017-2024).
  • Assessed bridging therapy modalities: chemotherapy, polatuzumab-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy, corticosteroids, and none.
  • Analyzed associations of bridging therapy with overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival using logistic regression and Cox models.
  • Overall response rate was highest with polatuzumab (50%) and radiotherapy (40%) compared to chemotherapy (16%).
  • Radiotherapy with comprehensive treatment yielded an overall response rate of 51%, significantly higher than non-comprehensive treatment (12%).
  • Two-year progression-free survival was highest with radiotherapy (47%) and polatuzumab (37%) as compared to chemotherapy (21%).
  • Adjusted analyses indicated improved overall survival with radiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.40) and progression-free survival with both radiotherapy (0.29) and polatuzumab (0.41).
  • Chemotherapy was associated with the highest two-year lymphoma-related mortality (74%).

Abstract

Bridging therapy (BT) is frequently used in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy, but the optimal BT approach remains uncertain. We evaluated BT strategies and their associations with response and survival outcomes. Accordingly, we included patients with R/R LBCL evaluated for third-line or later CD19-directed CAR T at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2017 to 2024 (follow-up to 01/2025). BT modalities included chemotherapy, polatuzumab-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy, corticosteroids, and none. We assessed the associations of BT modality with overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using logistic regression and Cox models. Among 219 patients, 188 underwent apheresis and 157 (84%) received CAR T. Of those apheresed, 79% received BT (radiotherapy 41%, polatuzumab-based 26%, third-line chemotherapy 16%, corticosteroids 17%, while 21% received no BT). ORR was highest with polatuzumab (50%) and radiotherapy (40%) versus chemotherapy (16%) (p = 0.009). Median ΔSUVmax in 84 patients was higher in polatuzumab and radiotherapy treated patients, compared to chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Radiotherapy encompassing all active disease had higher ORR (51%) versus non-comprehensive (12%) (p = 0.04). Two-year PFS was highest with radiotherapy (47%) and polatuzumab (37%) BT versus chemotherapy (21%). Adjusted analyses showed improved PFS with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio aHR 0.29) and polatuzumab (aHR 0.41). OS was also improved with radiotherapy (HR 0.40). Chemotherapy BT was associated with the highest 2-year lymphoma-related mortality (74%). In conclusion, polatuzumab-based and radiotherapy BT as well as no BT were associated with improved responses and outcomes compared to chemotherapy. Although these results may have been influenced by patient selection, prospective studies integrating these approaches are needed to define optimal, individualized BT strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70e7531e4c4a9ff5b1d7https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70183
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper