PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Journal of the American Heart Association0 citationsOpen Access

Survival Benefit of Heart–Kidney Versus Heart Transplant With or Without Delayed Kidney Transplant

View Full Paper
SYShin YajimaHHH HeSEStefan Elde

Key Points

  • This study evaluates outcomes and survival benefits of simultaneous heart–kidney transplantation versus isolated heart transplantation and kidney-after-heart transplantation.
  • Retrospective analysis using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2000 to 2022.
  • Included adult patients who underwent first isolated heart transplant or simultaneous heart–kidney transplant.
  • Primary outcome assessed was patient survival using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model.
  • Logistic regression identified risk factors for post-isolated kidney transplantation following heart transplant.
  • SHKT recipients had significantly higher survival rates compared to IHT recipients (1-year: 88.0% vs. 85.7%; 5-year: 70.5% vs. 64.1%; 10-year: 38.1% vs. 30.3%, P=0.005).
  • SHKT showed higher long-term survival compared to kidney-after-heart transplantation (5-year: 72.1% vs. 61.9%, P=0.047; 10-year: 42.9% vs. 15.8%, P<0.001).
  • Recipient age, body mass index, pre-IHT diabetes, prior dialysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significant risk factors for post-IHT isolated kidney transplantation.

Abstract

Background Simultaneous heart–kidney transplantation (SHKT) or isolated heart transplantation (IHT) benefits patients with end‐stage heart disease and kidney dysfunction. Understanding the outcomes, risk factors for post‐IHT kidney transplantation, and survival benefits of SHKT compared with those of IHT and kidney‐after‐heart transplantation can guide clinical decision‐making. This study aimed to evaluate IHT outcomes, identify risk factors for post‐IHT isolated kidney transplantation, and compare the survival benefits of IHT, SHKT, and kidney‐after‐heart transplantation. Methods This retrospective study analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, spanning 2000 to 2022. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent their first IHT (n=48 069) or SHKT (n=2345) were included. Among patients undergoing IHT, 667 (1.4%) subsequently received isolated kidney transplantation. The primary outcome was patient survival, which was visualized by Kaplan–Meier analysis and assessed using the shared‐frailty Cox proportional hazards model. Survival rates were compared among IHT, SHKT, and kidney‐after‐heart transplantation recipients. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors for post‐IHT isolated kidney transplantation. Results The recipient's age, body mass index, pre‐IHT diabetes, prior dialysis, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significant risk factors for post‐IHT isolated kidney transplantation. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed significantly higher survival with SHKT than with IHT (1‐year: 88.0% versus 85.7%; 5‐year: 70.5% versus 64.1%; 10‐year: 38.1% versus 30.3%; overall P =0.005). Compared with kidney‐after‐heart transplantation, SHKT tended to show lower short‐term survival but higher long‐term survival (5‐year: 72.1% versus 61.9%, P =0.047; 10‐year: 42.9% versus 15.8%, P <0.001). Conclusions Selected patients with end‐stage heart disease and kidney dysfunction derive more long‐term survival benefit from SHKT than from IHT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yajima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70f8531e4c4a9ff5b4a1https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.043669
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper