This study compares the effectiveness of four cement types—Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), Steel Slag-based Portland Cement (SSPC), Calcium Aluminate Cement (CAC), and Magnesium Phosphate Cement (MPC)—in the solidification/stabilization (S/S) of copper ions (Cu 2+ ). A simplified model system isolated the intrinsic interactions between the cement matrices and the heavy metal. A comprehensive suite of macro- and micro-analytical techniques, including semi-dynamic leaching, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, unconfined compressive strength, BCR sequential extraction, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy combined analysis, and X-ray diffraction analysis, was utilized. Results demonstrated that SSPC performed best overall, with negligible Cu 2+ leaching, high residual strength, and the highest proportion of stable chemical species. Its superiority stemmed from a synergistic triple-mechanism: physical encapsulation by a dense microstructure, chemical precipitation under high pH, and lattice fixation within iron-aluminate phases from steel slag. In contrast, OPC showed reliable but lesser performance, whereas CAC and MPC suffered from early-stage instability and high acidity susceptibility, respectively. Therefore, SSPC is recommended as the optimal S/S binder for Cu 2+ , combining exceptional immobilization capacity with the environmental benefit of recycling industrial solid waste. This work provides critical mechanistic insights and a scientific basis for selecting and developing high-performance cementitious materials for heavy metal remediation. • Compared Cu 2+ solidification efficacy of four different types of cement. • Analyzed the effects of Cu 2+ on the compressive strength of four cements. • Revealed the intrinsic mechanisms and quantified chemical states of solidified Cu.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chuang Yu
BING-SHENG HUANG
Xiaoqing Cai
Journal of Environmental Management
Wenzhou University
Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc0b85af8044f7a4e95b7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129174