Environmentalists have long seen in the watershed the promise of an ethic of stewardship predicated on the recognition that no action affecting a waterway can be free from upstream influences and downstream impacts. This article explores a context in which thinking in terms of watersheds acquired new scientific and political prominence: Taiwan under Japanese colonial rule (1895–1945). In the wake of destructive lowland floods, Japanese foresters blamed highland Indigenous peoples and their practices of shifting cultivation. This accusation reflected not just colonial condescension but also Japanese assumptions about watershed hydrology. Although contested within the colonial state, watershed protection became a common justification for violent dispossessions of Atayalic and Bunun communities. Large dam construction later intensified these dynamics by replacing river watersheds with sensitive reservoir watersheds. Interrogating the watershed reveals its political plasticity and shows the interplay between discourses of ecological interconnectedness and culpability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Kanbayashi
Environmental History
California University of Pennsylvania
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John Kanbayashi (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc0b85af8044f7a4e95e8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/740094