PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2026International Journal of General Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Eosinophilic Heart Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management – A Narrative Review

JDJing DongHFHaoran FuNWNa Wu

Key Result

Modern therapies improved five-year survival to over 80% in patients diagnosed with eosinophilic heart disease.

Key Points

  • To explore the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management approaches for eosinophilic heart disease.
  • Narrative review of existing literature
  • Analysis of clinical presentations
  • Assessment of diagnostic techniques including MRI and biopsies
  • Overview of current management strategies
  • Eosinophilic heart disease varies from asymptomatic to severe life-threatening conditions.
  • Diagnosis involves multimodal techniques including laboratory tests and imaging.
  • Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis.
  • Management focuses on treating underlying causes and reducing cardiac damage.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with eosinophilic heart disease (EHD)

Eosinophilic heart disease is a rare, potentially fatal condition requiring high clinical suspicion, multimodal imaging, and endomyocardial biopsy for diagnosis, with treatment tailored to the underlying etiology.

Limitations

  • No standardized treatment protocols exist for eosinophilic heart disease.
  • Data on incidence and prognosis are limited due to rarity and heterogeneity of disease.
  • Endomyocardial biopsy, the diagnostic gold standard, has limited sensitivity (~50%) and is invasive.
  • Lack of prospective studies and randomized controlled trials limits evidence strength.

Abstract

Abstract: Eosinophilic heart disease (EHD) is an inflammatory cardiac disorder characterized by the infiltration and subsequent heart tissue damage mediated by eosinophils. The clinical manifestations of EHD vary widely, ranging from asymptomatic to severe, life-threatening conditions. Diagnosis relies on a multimodal approach, incorporating clinical presentations, laboratory findings (e.g. hypereosinophilia), and advanced imaging studies such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and echocardiography. However, the gold standard for definitive diagnosis remains endomyocardial biopsy, which demonstrates eosinophilic infiltration and associated myocardial injury. Currently, there is no established consensus on specific therapeutic protocols for EHD. Management primarily targets the underlying etiology and mitigates eosinophil-induced cardiac damage. Prognosis is highly variable and largely dependent on the causative pathology, with outcomes spanning from rapidly progressive and fatal courses to indolent, chronic disease progression. Given the heterogeneity in clinical presentation and treatment responses, there is an urgent need for evidence-based clinical guidelines to standardize the management of EHD. Keywords: eosinophilic heart disease, hypereosinophilia, clinical presentation, endomyocardial biopsy, prognosis

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2026) conducted a review in Patients with eosinophilic heart disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration causing myocardial injury. Modern therapies improved five-year survival to over 80% in patients diagnosed with eosinophilic heart disease.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69abc1a65af8044f7a4ea821https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s586348
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper