PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026Sustainability1 citationsOpen Access

Fly Ash and Bottom Ash from Biomass and Coal: Comparison of Properties in Grate and Fluidized Bed Combustion from the Perspective of Construction Applications

View Full Paper
KKKarolína KrálováPFPetr FormáčekMŠMartina Šídlová

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the properties of biomass ash produced from various combustion methods for potential use in construction.
  • Analyzed 23 biomass ash samples from grate and fluidized bed combustion, along with co-combustion with coal.
  • Evaluated chemical, mineralogical, and physical characteristics of the ashes.
  • Assessed compliance with EN 450-1 and EN 197-1 standards.
  • None of the analyzed samples met the EN 450-1 requirements.
  • Variability in composition was largely influenced by fuel type and combustion method.
  • BMA showed potential under EN 197-1, allowing for up to 5 wt.% additional constituents after further processing.

Abstract

The cement industry seeks alternative raw materials to lower its environmental impact, and biomass ash represents a potential material for construction applications. This study evaluates biomass ashes (BMA) produced from grate and fluidized bed combustion, as well as co-combustion with coal, focusing on their chemical, mineralogical, and physical characteristics. The results reveal a substantial variability in BMA composition, influenced primarily by the fuel type and combustion method. This heterogeneity critically affects the reactivity and overall suitability of the BMA for use in construction materials. It was found that none of the 23 analyzed samples met the requirements of EN 450-1. This outcome is largely attributable to the combustion process and to sampling from the bottom part of the boiler, which typically yields material with properties outside the limits of the standard. Even when assessed directly against the specific limit values of EN 450-1, the ashes did not comply without further processing or modification. Despite these limitations, BMA show potential for use in accordance with EN 197-1, which permits the incorporation of up to 5 wt.% minor additional constituents. However, their practical application under this framework requires validation through tests performed on hydrated cement. These findings underline both the limitations and the promise of BMA as a supplementary cementitious material (SCMs) in sustainable construction.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Králová et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ad1304e7e9681137aa8e8ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18052592
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper