Background Stroke is a significant cause of disability worldwide, often resulting in persistent upper-limb dysfunction. Robot-assisted therapy has emerged as an effective rehabilitation strategy by enabling intensive, repetitive, and task-specific training. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of resistance- versus assistance-based robotic interventions on brain activation and motor recovery in patients with stroke, as these effects remain insufficiently understood. Methods Twenty-five adults with hemiparetic stroke were randomized to a resistance-based robot training group (RTG, n = 13) or assistance-based robot training group (ATG, n = 12). Interventions were delivered using the InMotion 2.0 for 30 min per session, five sessions/week over 4 weeks. Brain activation was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), motor function using the Fugl–Meyer Assessment for the Upper Limb (FM-UL) and kinematic indices from InMotion 2.0, and activities of daily living using the Motor Activity Log (MAL). Results Prefrontal activation decreased from pre- to post-intervention in both groups. In the ipsilesional hemispheres, differences between groups were significant ( p 0.05). In the resistance training group, additional improvements were found in mean velocity, circle size, and movement independence ( p 0.05). Both groups showed significant gains in FM-UL and ADL performance ( p 0.05), with no significant between-group differences in these measures. Conclusion Resistance-based robotic training was associated with greater motor improvements in kinematic smoothness, and larger reductions in prefrontal activation within ipsilesional hemispheres compared with assistance-based training. These findings suggest differences in prefrontal activation patterns accompanied by improvements in kinematic movement smoothness in stroke survivors. Clinical trial registration https://cris.nih.go.kr , (Registration Number: KCT0011076).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kwon et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada873bc08abd80d5bb698 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1756167
Il-Ho Kwon
Won-Seob Shin
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Frontiers in Neurology
Daejeon University
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare
Ministry of Health and Welfare
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...