This dataset contains the LaTeX source and supporting materials for a buildable, falsifiable experiment designed to test a core prediction of the Quantum Measurement Units (QMU) framework using a tapered ``trumpet'' Tesla resonator. The apparatus separates a broad, high-current lower region from a narrow, high-potential upper region terminated by a smooth metallic topload, allowing a same-device comparison between an electrostatic top-load channel and a magnetic ground-return channel. The central revision in this version is the replacement of the earlier direct carrier assignment \ (q=Cₓ₎V₊\) and proxy relation \ (Q= I₊\) with an explicit SI--QMU bridge based on synchronized waveform measurements. The experimentally compared distributed charges are now defined as^ (2) ₄, ₓ₎=ccf\, Cₓ₎V₊, ^ (2) ₌, ₆₍₃=ccfₓ䃐^tV I ₆ (t) \, dt, =e₄₌₀ₗ^{2}e the charge conversion factor, \ (Cₓ₎\) is the in-situ electrostatic capacitance associated with the metallic topload share, \ (V₊\) is the synchronized crest voltage, and the current integral is taken over the dominant charging interval ending at the same crest. The tested QMU mapping is therefore^ (2) ₄, ₓ₎=8\, q^ (2) ₌, ₆₍₃, \₄ₗₓₑ₀₂ₓ₄₃=Cₓ₎ₕ_₊8ₓ䃐^{tV I ₆ (t) \, dt}. \ A major structural correction in this version is the explicit distinction between the total terminal capacitance of the assembled resonator, ₓ₄ₑ₌, the metallic-topload electrostatic share, ₓ₎. prevents the experiment from collapsing into a trivial restatement of total charge continuity. The conventional electromagnetic benchmark is now written in the factorized form\₄ₗₓₑ₀₂ₓ₄₃=ₓ₎_ₖ₀ₕ₄8, ₓ₎=Cₓ₎Cₓ₄ₑ₌, ₖ₀ₕ₄=Cₓ₄ₑ₌ₕ_₊J ₆, ₆=ₓ䃐^tV I ₆ (t) \, dt. standard tapered transmission-line modeling, both \ (ₓ₎\) and \ (ₖ₀ₕ₄\) are expected to vary with flare law, topload family, coupling, branch selection, loss, and drive modality. Thus, if \ (₄ₗₓₑ₀₂ₓ₄₃\) remains equal to the fine-structure constant across those controlled changes, the result would exceed the conventional benchmark and support the QMU mapping. The paper now provides: (i) complete construction specifications for trumpet and cylindrical-control builds, including flare law, turn schedule, topload family, tolerances, and primary geometry; (ii) standard-operating procedures to extract \ (Cₓ₄ₑ₌\) by low-power VNA fitting and to bracket \ (Cₓ₎\) through isolated-topload measurement, proximity correction, and differential validation; (iii) synchronized high-power waveform protocols using complex transfer-function de-embedding for the voltage and current channels; (iv) a single-path ground-return requirement so that the measured current integral represents the intended charge transfer; (v) a formal streamer/corona gate to enforce confined, closed-resonator operation; (vi) intentional coupling sweeps and drive-modality replication as explicit nuisance-parameter tests; and (vii) an uncertainty budget propagated directly to \ (₄ₗₓₑ₀₂ₓ₄₃\), with the top-load capacitance bracket treated as the dominant potential systematic. Implications for the original QMU program remain explicit. If the electrostatic and magnetic distributed charges obey^ (2) ₄, ₓ₎=8\, q^ (2) ₌, ₆₍₃, the same fixed geometry factor that relates the QMU channel constants, ᵤ=16^2kC, reflected experimentally in a macroscopic resonant device. In the broader ledger, the channel constants remain linked to the driver throughᵤ=Gforce\, C^{2}{eₐ^2}, C=Gforce\, C^{2}16^{2eₐ^2}, thatᵤ=16^2kC, =16^2kC\, {eₐ^2}{C^2}. , the trumpet-resonator experiment is positioned not merely as a Tesla-coil geometry study, but as a falsifiable macroscopic probe of the electrostatic--RMFD channel relation within QMU.
David Thomson (Mon,) studied this question.