PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Veterinary Research0 citationsOpen Access

Conjunctival administration of H38ΔwbkF rough vaccine as an effective strategy to protect against Brucella ovis infection while minimizing serological interference

NLNerea LopezSASara Andrés-BarrancoMMM. Jesús De Miguel

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of conjunctival administration of H38ΔwbkF vaccine against Brucella ovis while minimizing serological interference.
  • Developed wadB and wadC mutants to alter R-LPS diagnostic epitopes.
  • Administered H38ΔwbkF vaccine via conjunctival route in rams.
  • Assessed protection against B. ovis and interference in serological tests.
  • H38ΔwbkF preserved efficacy in rams through conjunctival administration.
  • Significantly reduced serological interference compared to subcutaneous route.
  • Core-defective mutants were ineffective and over-attenuated.

Abstract

Sheep brucellosis is a reproductive disease caused by Brucella melitensis and B. ovis, Gram-negative bacteria that differ in surface antigens: B. melitensis carries a smooth (S) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with a characteristic O-polysaccharide (O-PS), while B. ovis bears a rough (R) LPS lacking O-PS. Only the former is zoonotic and of public health concern, but both cause significant economic losses, thus requiring effective vaccines. The sole vaccine available, B. melitensis Rev1, protects against both infections but induces antibodies detected by S-LPS-based tests used for B. melitensis surveillance. Since controlling this zoonotic species is a priority, Rev1 is banned in B. melitensis-free areas. Consequently, B. ovis (detected by R-LPS-based tests) remains endemic or re-emerges, and an R brucellosis vaccine is needed. Previously, we demonstrated that subcutaneous vaccination with B. melitensis R mutant H38ΔwbkF protects rams against B. ovis similarly to Rev1, without interfering in the official S-LPS-based Rose Bengal and Complement Fixation tests. However, H38ΔwbkF elicits R-LPS antibodies that interfere with B. ovis tests. Here, we explored two strategies to minimize this interference: (i) altering H38ΔwbkF relevant diagnostic epitopes by constructing wadB and wadC mutants deleted in sugars of the R-LPS core tetrasaccharide branch; and (ii) administering H38ΔwbkF conjunctivally, a route known to reduce antibody responses to S brucellosis vaccines. While the core-defective mutants were over-attenuated and failed to protect mice, the conjunctival route preserved H38ΔwbkF efficacy in rams and significantly reduced serological interference. Conjunctival H38ΔwbkF vaccine is thus a suitable tool for B. ovis eradication in B. melitensis-free areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lopez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af954870916d39fea4cab6https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-025-01693-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Mutants in the lipopolysaccharide of Brucella ovis are attenuated and protect against B. ovis infection in mice2014 · 53 citations
  2. 2IMMUNIZATION AGAINST BRUCELLA INFECTION VI.Brucella melitensis1957 · 120 citations
  3. 3Techniques for the Brucellosis laboratory1990 · 29 citations
  4. 4A Broad Host Range Mobilization System for In Vivo Genetic Engineering: Transposon Mutagenesis in Gram Negative Bacteria1983 · 7,340 citations
  5. 5Comparison of three serological tests for Brucella ovis infection of rams using different antigenic extracts1989 · 60 citations