PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Infectious Disease Modelling0 citationsOpen Access

A Predictive Model for Rapid Assessment of Protective Efficacy Against Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants

View Full Paper
LJLairun JinSJSiyue JiaCSChengwei Shao

Key Points

  • To create a predictive model that evaluates vaccine-induced protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
  • Integrated two models: neutralizing antibody efficacy and genetic distance efficacy.
  • Developed a composite framework through sieve analysis.
  • Extracted data from 23 published studies.
  • Validated the model using the leave-one-out method.
  • Achieved a predictive accuracy with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.93 for the respective submodels.
  • Estimated 95.40% protection against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 with the best regimen.
  • Predicted lower efficacy against Delta (79.56%) and Omicron variants (68.21%).
  • General low efficacy (<50%) for various Omicron sublineages.

Abstract

An effective predictive model of protection would be very helpful to provide a timely and reliable evaluation of the vaccine induced protection against corresponding to rapidly emerging evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants. By integrating the validated “neutralizing antibody-vaccine efficacy” and “modified genetic distance-vaccine efficacy” models, we developed a composite sieve analysis framework (the “neutralizing antibody-genetic distance-vaccine efficacy” model) to predict the protective efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine regimens, particularly for different heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination regimens. Data for the model building were extracted from 23 published studies. Leave-one-out method was used to validate the model. Model validation demonstrated that the composite framework achieved high predictive accuracy, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.82-0.98) for the “neutralizing antibody-vaccine efficacy” submodel and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.49-0.99) for the “modified genetic distance-vaccine efficacy” submodel. Most prediction errors were within 5% and 10%, respectively. By applying this framework with neutralizing antibody data and SARS-CoV-2 variant sequencing data, we predicted the protective efficacy of different heterologous prime-boost regimens. The regimen of two-dose CoronaVac plus one-dose aerosolized Ad5-nCoV was estimated to confer 95.40% (95% CI: 92.67-98.13%) protection against symptomatic infection with wild-type SARS-CoV-2 at day 28 post-boost, 79.56% (95% CI: 53.31-100.00%) against the Delta variant, and 68.21% (95% CI: 42.53-93.89%) against Omicron BA.5.2.20. Predicted efficacy against other Omicron sublineages was generally below 50%, with near-zero efficacy for KP.2, KP.3 and XDV.1. Compared with this regimen, two-dose CoronaVac plus one-dose intramuscular Ad5-nCoV booster or three-dose CoronaVac yielded consistently lower predicted efficacy across all variants. This study offers a generalizable approach for rapidly evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines against emerging variants, providing timely evidence to guide vaccine deployment in future outbreaks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af957570916d39fea4d023https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2026.03.003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper