PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026International Journal of Hydrogen Energy1 citationsOpen Access

Design and risk assessment of integrated H2 fuel cell systems for rail transportation

View Full Paper
MPMaria PortarapilloABAlmerinda Di Benedetto

Key Points

  • The research aims to design and assess integrated hydrogen fuel cell systems for railway applications, focusing on safety and efficiency.
  • Developed on-board energy systems combining hydrogen production and utilization.
  • Conducted process simulations in AspenPlus® for energy balance and heat integration.
  • Performed quantitative risk analysis using empirical models to evaluate storage and handling hazards.
  • Ethanol presented the lowest risk index at 10 −6 yr −1 compared to other fuels.
  • Ammonia showed the most compact storage requirement at 21 m³.
  • The evaluation indicated that solutions heavily depend on the production source, whether fossil or renewable.

Abstract

Hydrogen-powered train technology is a promising solution for decarbonising non-electrified railway lines that currently rely on diesel. This study focuses on the development and evaluation of integrated on-board energy systems for hydrogen production and utilization in railway applications. The system combines an on-board reactor with a high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) to efficiently generate electricity from alternative fuels such as methanol, ethanol, glycerol and ammonia. Process simulations in AspenPlus® assess the energy balance, heat integration and self-sustainability under real operating conditions on the Brescia-Edolo railway line. In addition, a quantitative risk analysis (QRA) using empirical models and PHAST evaluates the hazards associated with the storage and handling of these fuels. Results showed that ethanol has the lowest risk (10 −6 yr −1 ) while ammonia the lowest volume (21 m 3 ). The final ranking of the different solutions strongly depends on the production source (fossil or renewable). • Feasibility and risk evaluation of hydrogen-based on-board rail energy systems. • Alcohol reforming and ammonia cracking evaluated for hydrogen fuel cell trains. • Energy and storage systems sized for 10 h autonomy on the Brescia–Edolo line. • Ethanol shows the lowest risk index (10 −6 yr −1 ) while ammonia provides the most compact storage (21 m 3 ).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Portarapillo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af959570916d39fea4d419https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154382
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper