PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Silent Saboteur of Immunotherapy: Antibiotic Use and Its Impact on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Studies

View Full Paper
GCGiuliana CiappinaETEnrica ToscanoGMGiordana Di Mauro

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize evidence on how antibiotic use affects the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Searched PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE for relevant studies from 2018 to 2025.
  • Included studies that defined the antibiotic exposure window and reported time-to-event outcomes.
  • Analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using random-effects models.
  • Performed a sensitivity analysis specifically for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • Included 15 studies with 52,489 patients.
  • ABT was linked to worse overall survival (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.29) and progression-free survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.95–1.27).
  • In NSCLC analysis, ABT was associated with inferior PFS and significantly reduced OS when accounting for heterogeneity.

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of solid tumors, yet only a subset of patients achieve durable benefit. The gut microbiota is a key modulator of antitumor immunity, and systemic antibiotic therapy (ABT), frequently prescribed—and sometimes overused—in oncology, can profoundly disrupt microbial homeostasis. Observational studies suggest that ABT may impair ICI efficacy, but results remain heterogeneous, warranting an updated synthesis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 2018 and 2025 evaluating the association between ABT exposure and time-to-event outcomes in patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs. Studies were required to report explicit definition of the ABT exposure window. Random-effects models were considered primary. A sensitivity analysis was performed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Fifteen studies encompassing 52,489 patients were included. ABT exposure was associated with significantly worse OS (random-effects HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03–1.29) and PFS (random-effects HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.95–1.27), indicating an increased risk of death and disease progression compared with no ABT exposure. In the NSCLC sensitivity analysis, ABT was consistently associated with inferior PFS and, when accounting for heterogeneity, with significantly reduced OS, supporting the robustness of the association. Conclusions: ABT administered in temporal proximity to ICIs is associated with clinically meaningful worsening of survival outcomes across solid tumors, consistent with microbiome-mediated impairment of immunotherapy efficacy. These findings support cautious ABT stewardship in patients receiving ICIs and highlight the need for prospective studies integrating microbiome profiling and standardized ABT exposure assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ciappina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95a470916d39fea4d74fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050869
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper