PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures0 citations

Effect of Weak‐Filled Layer Properties on the Mechanical Response, Crack Evolution, and Failure Characteristics of Jointed Rock

View Full Paper
BXBowen XueHLHailong LiuZYZhenyi Yan

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate how weak-filled layer properties affect the mechanical response and failure characteristics of jointed rock.
  • Performed uniaxial compression tests on rock-like specimens with weak-filled layers at 45° inclination.
  • Varied joint roughness coefficients (JRC) to assess their impact on peak stress and failure strain.
  • Developed a three-dimensional weak-filled rough joint numerical model using the adaptive solid-to-DES method.
  • Increasing JRC initially raises and then decreases peak stress, while failure strain progressively increases.
  • Fracture modes transition from interface sliding to mixed tensile-shear failure as JRC increases.
  • Higher JRC leads to matrix splitting, with thicker fillings requiring smaller JRC for failure transition.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Uniaxial compression tests were performed on rock‐like specimens containing a weak‐filled layer (WFL) with a 45° inclination angle and varying joint roughness coefficients (JRC). The results show that increasing JRC causes a tendency to first rise and then decrease in peak stress and to progressively increase in failure strain. The increasing JRC causes the fracture mode transition from interface sliding to mixed tensile–shear failure. A three‐dimensional weak‐filled rough joint (WFRJ) rock‐like numerical model was developed to explore the coupled effects of JRC, filling thickness (T), and strength of WFL ( λ ) using the adaptive solid‐to‐DES method. A higher JRC induces the shift from interface sliding to matrix splitting, while thicker fillings require smaller JRC for the transition and promote broader crack propagation. For low and greater WFL strength, the failure is dominated by interface sliding and matrix splitting, respectively, which means that the higher WFL strength suppresses WFL failure but intensifies matrix damage.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95a470916d39fea4d7a4https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.70222
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper