PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026International Journal of Clinical Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Relationship of Waist Circumference With Osteoporosis: Results From the NHANES and Mendelian Randomization Study

View Full Paper
HLHuan LiuMSMingyuan SongLHLongsheng Huang

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the causal relationship between waist circumference and osteoporosis using data from NHANES and Mendelian randomization.
  • Combined data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and conducted Mendelian randomization analysis.
  • Conducted baseline characteristic analysis and various statistical assessments including risk stratification and ROC analyses.
  • Validated findings through correlation analysis, randomness assessment, and sensitivity testing.
  • Significant association found between waist circumference and osteoporosis, indicating risk decreases as waist circumference increases.
  • Independent factors highlighted with odds ratios demonstrating the protective effect of increased waist circumference.
  • Mendelian randomization analysis confirmed waist circumference as a protective factor with a significant causal relationship.

Abstract

Background Osteoporosis (OP), characterized by reduced bone mass and microstructural imbalances in bone tissue, is one of the most prevalent bone diseases worldwide. OP imposes a significant societal burden and is influenced by various factors, such as age. However, the causal relationship between OP and waist circumference (WC) remains uncertain. Investigating this relationship is essential for early detection and prevention of at‐risk individuals. Methods This study combined data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to examine the association between WC and OP. Baseline characteristics were first analyzed using NHANES data, followed by association, risk stratification, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. MR analysis was then conducted and validated through correlation analysis, randomness assessment, and sensitivity testing. Results The NHANES data indicated a significant association between WC and OP, both as an independent factor and after adjusting for various covariates (Model 1: odds ratio (OR) = 0.976, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.968–0.984, p < 0.001; Model 2: OR = 0.988, 95% CI = 0.979–0.997, p < 0.01; Model 3: OR = 0.985, 95% CI = 0.976–0.994, p < 0.01). In addition, WC exhibited a strong predictive effect on OP (AUC = 0.797). MR analysis identified WC as a protective factor, revealing a significant causal relationship with OP (OR = 0.994, 95% CI = 0.990–0.999, p < 0.05). Rigorous evaluations confirmed these findings, consistent with NHANES results, further reinforcing the association between WC and OP. Conclusion A significant association exists between WC and OP, with the risk decreasing as WC increases. These findings offer valuable insights for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af95b470916d39fea4d820https://doi.org/10.1155/ijcp/4996148
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper