PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Impact of Abusive Supervision on Quiet Quitting: The Mediating Role of Sleep Deprivation and the Moderating Role of Proactive Personality

View Full Paper
ZGZiyi GongXLXiaomeng LiHCHyeran Choi

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between abusive supervision, sleep deprivation, and quiet quitting in employees.
  • Utilized three-wave, time-lagged data collection from tourism and hospitality employees.
  • Analyzed the mediating role of sleep deprivation in the relationship between abusive supervision and quiet quitting.
  • Examined the moderating role of proactive personality on these associations.
  • Abusive supervision positively correlates with sleep deprivation and quiet quitting.
  • Sleep deprivation serves as a significant mediator between abusive supervision and quiet quitting.
  • Proactive personality reinforces the impact of abusive supervision on sleep deprivation and, consequently, quiet quitting.

Abstract

In the tourism and hospitality industry, abusive supervision is a common social stressor, yet how it relates to employees’ behavioral adjustment remains underexplored, particularly when considering recovery processes outside of work. Drawing on Conservation of Resources (COR) theory, this study conceptualizes sleep deprivation as an indicator of impaired recovery that may help explain time-ordered associations between abusive supervision and quiet quitting. Based on three-wave, time-lagged data collected from employees in the tourism and hospitality industry, the findings show that abusive supervision is positively associated with sleep deprivation and quiet quitting, and that sleep deprivation carries a significant indirect association between abusive supervision and quiet quitting. In addition, personality strengthens the association between abusive supervision and sleep deprivation and, in turn, strengthens the indirect association with quiet quitting. By integrating leadership behavior, recovery-related processes, and individual differences, this study reframes quiet quitting as a form of resource regulation and offers behavioral science implications for understanding employees’ work investment adjustment across work and non-work contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25abe96eeacc4fcec8ae6https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16030402
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Leadership that silences: abusive supervision and acquiescent silence from a COR theory perspective2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2“Trapped in the spiral”: how abusive supervision fuels quiet quitting through employee cynicism and acquiescent silence2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Navigating workplace stress: the link between abusive supervision, work-leisure imbalance, and quiet quitting2025 · 11 citations
  4. 4Navigating Workplace Toxicity: The Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Helping Behavior Among Hotel Employees with Self-Esteem and Emotional Contagion as Buffers2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5Abusive supervision, emotional exhaustion, and quiet quitting: a moderated mediation model of political skill2026 · 2 citations