PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 12, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Does Conserving Forests Reduce Poverty? Microeconomic Evidence From the Guayas Province, Ecuador

View Full Paper
HMHugo Donoso Reinoso1* and Jenniffer Maxi Murillo2

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between forest conservation and poverty at the individual level in Guayas, Ecuador.
  • Integrated socioeconomic microdata from the National Survey of Employment, Unemployment, and Underemployment (ENEMDU 2023) with forest cover data from MapBiomas.
  • Utilized a weighted Logit model with robust standard errors grouped by canton to analyze the data.
  • Controlled for demographic, educational, and productive integration characteristics.
  • No statistically significant effect of forest cover on poverty probability was found when controlling for other factors.
  • Economic activity sectors and structural socioeconomic factors play a more critical role in determining well-being.
  • Findings imply that environmental conservation alone does not improve socioeconomic conditions without additional economic mechanisms.

Abstract

The relationship between environmental conservation and social well-being remains a topic of debate in the scientific literature, especially in developing countries where poverty and pressure on natural resources coexist. This study empirically analyzes the relationship between forest cover and the probability of poverty at the individual level in the province of Guayas, Ecuador, integrating socioeconomic microdata from the National Survey of Employment, Unemployment, and Underemployment (ENEMDU 2023) with territorial information on forest cover from MapBiomas. Using a weighted Logit model with robust standard errors grouped by canton, the study assesses whether a greater forest cover is associated with better living conditions for the population. The results show that forest cover does not have a statistically significant effect on the probability of poverty, once demographic, educational, and productive integration characteristics are controlled for. In contrast, the sector of economic activity and other structural socioeconomic factors emerge as the main determinants of well-being. These findings suggest that environmental conservation, while fundamental to ecological sustainability, does not automatically translate into socioeconomic improvements without economic and institutional mechanisms to transform natural capital into real productive opportunities. The study provides relevant empirical evidence for the contemporary debate on poverty and the environment, highlighting the need for integrated public policies that link forest protection with territorial development strategies, productive inclusion, and a green economy. In this sense, the research contributes to a more realistic and critical understanding of the limitations and potential of forest conservation as a poverty reduction tool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hugo Donoso Reinoso1* and Jenniffer Maxi Murillo2 (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b25b0996eeacc4fcec958ahttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18930626
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper