PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Systematic Reviews0 citationsOpen Access

The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and co-agonists in adults without diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

View Full Paper
AMAreesha MoizPRPauline ReynierMTMichael A. Tsoukas

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists and co-agonists for weight loss in adults without diabetes.
  • Conduct systematic searches in PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases.
  • Include only randomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1 RAs/co-agonists to placebo or other GLP-1 RAs/co-agonists.
  • Assess weight loss outcomes at 6 months and 1–1.5 years.
  • Evaluate treatment safety and efficacy using frequentist network meta-analysis.
  • Assess study quality with Cochrane tools.
  • Target outcomes will include relative change in weight from baseline after 6 months and 1–1.5 years.
  • Absolute body weight change and total adverse events will be recorded as secondary outcomes.
  • Adverse events will include gastrointestinal issues and serious events, including mortality.

Abstract

Background Despite the increasing clinical use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), head-to-head evidence across these agents remains limited. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will assess the comparative efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs and novel co-agonists for weight loss among adults without diabetes. Methods We will systematically search the PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a GLP-1 RA/co-agonist to placebo or another GLP-1 RA/co-agonist. We will restrict inclusion to RCTs in adults with overweight or obesity; those including participants with diabetes, specific comorbidities or diseases, or history of bariatric surgery will be excluded. The primary outcome will be weight loss, expressed as relative change from baseline, assessed at 6 months (± 4 weeks) and 1–1.5 years (± 4 weeks). Secondary outcomes will include absolute body weight change, total adverse events, gastrointestinal adverse events, serious adverse events, and death. Pairwise meta-analyses and frequentist NMAs will be conducted using a random-effects model. Treatment rankings for efficacy and safety outcomes will be generated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The validity of the results and the assumptions underlying the analyses will be evaluated using a local and global approach. Study-level quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 tool and overall network quality will be assessed using the RoB-NMA tool. Discussion We aim to provide an up-to-date synthesis of RCTs assessing the weight loss effects of GLP-1 RAs and co-agonists among adults without diabetes to support future clinical decision-making, guideline development, and policy decisions. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD420251009368

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moiz et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3aad702a1e69014ccb838https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-026-03153-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper