PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Assessing verbal and spatial memory via smartphone

PKPeter KosaAAAmir Moghadam AhmadiMKMarie Kanu

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop and validate smartphone-based verbal and spatial memory tasks to monitor cognitive impairment, particularly in CNS disorders.
  • Enrolled 315 adults, including those with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and other CNS disorders.
  • Participants completed over 8,000 verbal and spatial memory trials via a smartphone app.
  • Extracted fourteen digital biomarkers related to sensory-motor processing and cognitive performance.
  • Used ordinal logistic regression to create composite memory scores for validation.
  • Spatial memory composite distinguished healthy individuals from various MS types and other CNS disorders (all P < 0.05).
  • Included digital biomarkers correlated strongly with global disability measures and lesion volume (Rho = 0.62–0.71, P < 0.008).
  • Good test-retest reliability established (ICC = 0.713-0.813).
  • Linear model predicted cognitive scores with notable accuracy (R² = 0.53, Rho = 0.74).

Abstract

Introduction Detecting subtle cognitive decline in chronic central nervous system (CNS) disease is hampered by practice effects, motor confounds, and the lack of premorbid baselines. Smartphone testing offers frequent unsupervised assessments but requires rigorous validation and internal quality control. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate smartphone-based verbal and spatial memory tasks, derive composite digital biomarkers, and determine their utility for monitoring cognitive impairment. Methods In a prospective study (2018–2025) we enrolled 315 adults 41 healthy donors, 217 people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), 57 other CNS disorders. Participants completed 5,875 verbal and 2,588 spatial trials on the Neurological Functions Test Suite App. We extracted fourteen digital biomarkers reflecting individualized Sensory-Motor Processing Thresholds (iSMPT), adjusted test latencies and test accuracies, and split the MS cohort into training ( n = 145) and validation ( n = 72) sets. Ordinal logistic regression generated composite scores that were tested in the held-out cohort. Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and criterion validity (Spearman Rho, R², Lin's concordance) were calculated; p -values 0.05 were considered significant. Results The spatial memory composite separated healthy donors from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS), progressive MS, non-inflammatory and inflammatory neurological diseases, and radiologically/clinically isolated syndromes (all P 0.05), outperforming all single biomarkers. With iSMPT included, it correlated most strongly with global disability Expanded Disability Status scale [EDSS, Neurological exam composite NeurEx; Rho = 0.62–0.63, P 0.001] and lesion volume (Rho = 0.71, P = 0.008); without iSMPT it tracked cognitive subscores EDSS Functional System Score 7 (FSS7), NeurEx panel 1; Rho = 0.50–0.53, P 0.001 and Combinatorial MRI Score of CNS tissue destruction (COMRIS-CTD; Rho = 0.63, P 0.001). Test–retest reliability was good (ICC = 0.813 with iSMPT; 0.713 without). A linear model using spatial memory biomarkers predicted Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) scores in an independent cohort ( n = 63; R² = 0.53, Rho = 0.74, concordance = 0.66), enabling a 95% prediction envelope for real-time quality control. Discussion The spatial memory composite provides a rapid, reliable, and sensory-motor delay-adjusted digital marker of mild cognitive dysfunction. Coupled with SDMT, it enhances unsupervised monitoring and internal quality assurance across diverse CNS disorders.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kosa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab0002a1e69014ccbb05https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1680389
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper