PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Clinical Nuclear Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Whole-body Dynamic 18FFDG-PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica

View Full Paper
BSBert-Ram SahAEAlexey EyrikhLHLars Husmann

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of whole-body dynamic PET/CT imaging for diagnosing giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica compared to static imaging.
  • Prospective enrollment of 25 patients with suspected GCA and/or PMR.
  • Dynamic PET imaging conducted using a standard PET/CT scanner.
  • Patlak analysis used to generate metabolic rate images of FDG.
  • Quantitation of pathologic FDG uptake in vessel walls and joints using target-to-background ratios.
  • 68% of patients showed pathologic FDG uptake.
  • 20% diagnosed with GCA alone, 24% with PMR alone, and another 24% with both conditions.
  • Significant differences in TBR between dynamic and static PET in both diseases (GCA P < 0.003, PMR P < 0.003).
  • TBRs were significantly higher in both diseases compared to healthy controls.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to explore the diagnostic efficacy of whole-body dynamic (WBD) acquisition using 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography/computed-tomography ( 18 FFDG-PET/CT) for the assessment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) compared with the standard static PET/CT. Methods: Twenty-five patients with suspected GCA and/or PMR were prospectively enrolled in this single-center study. WBD PET imaging was performed before treatment using a standard PET/CT scanner with a multibed multipass dynamic whole-body acquisition approach (dPET). Reconstructed datasets were used to generate metabolic rate of 18 FFDG (MR FDG ) images based on standard Patlak analysis. In case of pathologic FDG uptake, VOIs placed in vessel walls and joints were used for quantitation and definition of the target-to-background ratio (TBR): uptake in VOIs of vessel walls and joints (maximum values), to VOIs in blood pool (GCA), or to VOIs in normal muscles (PMR) (mean values). The final diagnosis based on the available imaging and laboratory results (except dPET), served as the standard of reference. Results: Seventeen of the 25 patients (68%) showed pathologic FDG uptake, of which 5 (20%) were finally diagnosed with GCA alone, 6 (24%) with PMR alone, and another 6 (24%) with both conditions. TBR difference between dPET and static PET was significant in both diseases(GCA P <0.003, PMR P <0.003), and TBRs of dPET and static PET were significantly higher in both diseases compared with the healthy controls. Conclusions: WBD 18 FFDG-PET/CT provided a significantly higher TBR in patients with GCA and PMR compared with standard static PET imaging. WBD 18 FFDG-PET/CT may potentially enhance the diagnostic accuracy in detecting GCA and PMR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ab9102a1e69014ccc861https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000006369
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Visualization of the Internal Thoracic Arteries in Giant Cell Arteritis on 18F-FDG Semiconductor PET/CT2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu aortitis: morphologic, pathogenetic and etiologic factors2000 · 144 citations
  3. 3Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis2009 · 226 citations
  4. 4Assessment of aortitis by semiquantitative analysis of 180-min 18F-FDG PET/CT acquisition images2014 · 50 citations
  5. 5Coronary Arteries Involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis Diagnosis Using 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT2025 · 3 citations