PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases3 citationsOpen Access

Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of cln3 disease (batten disease) using the Delphi consensus methodology

JMJonathan W. MinkHAHeather AdamsRARebecca Ahrens-Nicklas

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish comprehensive clinical care recommendations for CLN3 disease through expert consensus.
  • Conducted a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Utilized an Expert Mapping Tool (EMT) to identify multidisciplinary professionals and patient advocates.
  • Facilitated a modified-Delphi consensus process via virtual meetings for voting on clinical care statements.
  • Developed 53 recommendation statements across eleven domains related to CLN3 disease.
  • Achieved consensus on statements with at least 75% agreement among experts, except for three.
  • The overall AGREE II score for the guidelines was 6.4, indicating high quality.

Abstract

CLN3 disease, also called Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis (JNCL), or Batten disease, is an ultra‑rare, neurodegenerative lysosomal storage disorder generally affecting individuals during the first decade of life. There can be a delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis due to a lack of awareness, and when the most common presenting symptom of visual loss is attributed to more common conditions affecting vision. We used a previously published Expert Mapping Tool (EMT) to identify multidisciplinary professionals with diagnostic or clinical management expertise, as well as patient advocates with experience of CLN3 disease. A systematic literature review of published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses (PRISMA) guidance was conducted independently and simultaneously to develop key clinical care statements. Each statement was based on the strength of the evidence. The statements formed the basis of an international modified-Delphi consensus process using a virtual meeting platform (Within3). Experts were asked to agree or disagree with each statement and suggest any changes. Statements that reached a consensus of 75% or over are the guiding statements within this manuscript. The processes and manuscript have been independently assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) criteria. Thirty‑nine international experts from eight specialities were identified, including a patient advocate. Fifty‑three recommendation statements were developed covering eleven domains: General statements, Diagnostics, Clinical Recommendations and Management, Assessments, Social Considerations, Ocular Management, Epilepsy/Seizures, Nutrition, Respiratory Health, Sleep and Rest, and End-of-Life Care. Consensus was reached after one round of voting for all except three statements. The overall AGREE II score for developing these recommendations was 6.4, where 1 represents the lowest and 7 is the highest quality. Currently, there are no comprehensive clinical recommendations for CLN3 disease. These recommendations provide a comprehensive, evidence- and consensus‑based tool that can be used by all healthcare professionals involved in the management of CLN3 disease and other similar neurodegenerative conditions. The goal is to address the unmet clinical need for CLN3 disease management and complement other information available.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mink et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac8102a1e69014cce3d9https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04298-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper