PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 13, 2026Agronomy Journal0 citationsOpen Access

Nutrient uptake and partitioning of industrial hemp in the central Plains

View Full Paper
KRKraig L. RoozeboomJGJason GriffinDDDorivar A. Ruiz Diaz

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate nutrient uptake and biomass production of different hemp cultivars under various growing conditions in the central Great Plains.
  • Conducted over 3 years at three Kansas locations
  • Assessed biomass production and nutrient uptake in seven environments
  • Compared nutrient uptake between fiber and grain cultivars
  • Nutrient uptake increased with biomass production ranging from 1.7 to 9.8 Mg ha −1
  • Peak macronutrient uptake was 180 kg ha −1 nitrogen, 22 kg ha −1 phosphorus, and 173 kg ha −1 potassium
  • Fiber cultivars had greater uptake of potassium, calcium, and sulfur compared to grain cultivars
  • Cultivar types did not differ in potential export of dry biomass and most nutrients

Abstract

Abstract Hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) production was either illegal or highly regulated in the United States for most of the 20th century. The relaxation of regulations and development of fiber, grain, and cannabinoid markets since the turn of the 21st century has created the need for production information, including the fertility requirements of the crop. A series of experiments was conducted over 3 years at three Kansas locations to assess biomass production and nutrient uptake of fiber and hemp cultivars in seven environments representing a range of growing conditions in the central Great Plains. Nutrient uptake increased as biomass production increased across the range of 1.7–9.8 Mg ha −1 in these experiments ( R 2 = 0.41–0.86). Peak biomass production and uptake of potassium, calcium, and sulfur were greater for the fiber cultivar than for the grain cultivar. However, uptake of the remaining nutrients did not differ between cultivar types. Peak macronutrient uptake reached 180, 22, and 173 kg ha −1 of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, respectively. Secondary nutrient uptake reached 153, 27, and 16 kg ha −1 of calcium, magnesium, and sulfur, respectively. Micronutrient uptake reached 82, 1126, 856, and 272 g ha −1 of copper, iron, manganese, and zinc, respectively. Although dry matter and nutrient partitioning differed between fiber and grain cultivars, cultivar types did not differ in potential export (stalk + seed) of dry biomass and most nutrients. Nutrient management should differ for fiber versus grain production but may be similar for dual‐purpose production systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roozeboom et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b3ac8102a1e69014cce423https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70300
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nitrogen application and cultivar effects on industrial hemp yield dynamics2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2N, P, and S fertilization effects on industrial hemp in Saskatchewan2010 · 60 citations
  3. 3Factors related to iron uptake by dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. I. pH and reductant1980 · 118 citations
  4. 4Hemp; A Minor American Fiber Crop1946 · 6 citations
  5. 5Sorghum Growth and Development2019 · 32 citations